Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1223849
| From | "Wu, Songjun" <songjun.wu@atmel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier code |
| Date | 2015-09-14 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q8vAK-6Ed-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <q6qc9-48n-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6E5s-7qJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6Kky-7VO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6ZWi-59b-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7tUm-7o1-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | ATMEL |
On 9/11/2015 18:34, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:31:04AM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote: >> On 9/9/2015 17:52, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Yes, that's what's going to end up happening but it's not how controls >>> are expected to behave - applications will expect changing one control >>> to leave others unaffected so it's better to return an error rather than >>> change the other control. > >> If application change non EQ controls, the others will be unaffected. But >> the classD IP can only supports one EQ control at once, these three EQ >> controls point to the same register field, if application set a different EQ >> control, the error occurs, there will be many errors, it's not very >> reasonable to application. The best way I think is if application set one EQ >> control, the other EQ controls will change to 0dB, it's also consistent with >> fact. > > There's no really good solutions here - this is why my initial > suggestion was to have a single enumerated control. > You are right, your suggestion is reasonable, to have a single enumerated control. The second version will be made and sent soon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier code Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-09-07 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier code "Wu, Songjun" <songjun.wu@atmel.com> - 2015-09-08 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier code Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-09-08 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier code "Wu, Songjun" <songjun.wu@atmel.com> - 2015-09-09 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier code Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-09-09 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier code "Wu, Songjun" <songjun.wu@atmel.com> - 2015-09-10 04:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier code Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-09-11 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier code "Wu, Songjun" <songjun.wu@atmel.com> - 2015-09-14 08:40 +0200
csiph-web