Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #3201
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.msdos.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Loading DOS high on a XT |
| Date | 2019-03-30 08:04 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <q7n4fg$voo$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ca26ced2-1f41-40ee-bacc-5cead74a400b@n33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <katt9eh79mhkuq1di5jc4o5voip8j1msi4@4ax.com> |
T,
> I thought BIOS sets up RAM addressing. How do you integrate a
> selfbuilt module?
The same way the other "extension cards" (like video, ethernet and others)
do it for their extension ROMs (and RAM): pick a spot (above the 640K
border) where no other card claimed/got its and go sit there.
Its also possible that the 128KByte was not available as a contiguous range,
but instead in smaller blocks that had to be selected ("bank switching".
like, if I'm not mistaken, EMM did it).
The "self build" might be about having designed the circuitry and soldered
the chips himself. The actual access to such memory ranges has been
build-into the motherboard from the start.
And by the way, in that XP timeframe the addressing is "set up" by the
processor and other hardware on the motherboard. The "BIOS" is nothing
more than a collection of on-board and extension-card ROMs, exposing a set
of basic APIs and initialisation routines (in short: software). Nothing in
there can dictate how the addressing happens (other than to "pretty please"
the available hardware).
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Loading DOS high on a XT Ruud <Ruud.Baltissen@apg.nl> - 2012-07-15 23:16 -0700
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2012-07-16 02:58 -0400
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-07-16 05:10 -0400
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT Ruud <Ruud.Baltissen@apg.nl> - 2012-07-17 01:37 -0700
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2012-07-17 14:11 -0700
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT Ruud <Ruud.Baltissen@apg.nl> - 2012-07-17 22:36 -0700
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT T. Ment <t.ment@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-30 04:58 +0000
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-30 08:04 +0100
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-30 15:17 +0000
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-30 19:30 +0100
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-30 18:56 +0000
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-30 21:18 +0100
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-30 21:22 +0000
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-30 23:09 +0000
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-30 23:34 +0000
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-31 10:25 +0200
Re: Loading DOS high on a XT Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-04-02 18:05 -0400
csiph-web