Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #610818

Re: thiS Guy

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: thiS Guy
Date 2016-12-30 01:00 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <q6ogjd-ne4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <5862eafb$0$12001$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> <2a548d36-8be0-49f1-bb4e-f7aa59e5d6a7@googlegroups.com> <58632510$0$10281$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> <gt0cjd-qoh.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <58658c97$0$11852$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw


benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 12/28/2016 12:58 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 12/27/2016 6:11 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>>> BJ quacked Gosh Hardblow, That makes Bert EXACTLY like you! Say you
>>>> have an imaginary friend from the future like Bert does? I'm sure you
>>>> do. -----------
>>>>
>>>> Well since you believe in time travel to the past, you have lots of
>>>> choices for imaginary friends. Actually you don't even need time
>>>> travel... You believe in ghosts. Lol just go dig up a few
>>>>
>>>
>>> Since both you and Bert are totally ignorant of science you obviously do
>>> not know that the future can't cause the present. Hence it is impossible
>>> for Bert to have an imaginary friend who is really from the future. Of
>>> course you also are too ignorant to know that even if one could travel
>>> to the past, you can't change it because it's already happened and done
>>> with. You can only view it at best. You Hollywood types just get so
>>> excited when you start thinking about things you THINK are science.
>
>> Such as ghosts, ESP, remote viewing?
> 
> More than a century of ESP research and peer reviewed remote viewing 
> articles in Phys. Rev. and IEEE Proc. are nothing compared to your 
> personal opinion with nothing to back it up. We are all so impressed 
> with you and HVAC. Drooler.

You have been give several references to prove this.

My personal opinion has nothing to do with it kook.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: thiS Guy "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 12:44 -0800
  Re: thiS Guy "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-27 12:51 -0800
  Re: thiS Guy HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 13:21 -0800
    Re: thiS Guy benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-27 17:28 -0500
      Re: thiS Guy HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 15:11 -0800
        Re: thiS Guy benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-27 21:35 -0500
          Re: thiS Guy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-28 05:58 +0000
            Re: thiS Guy benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-29 17:22 -0500
              Re: thiS Guy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-30 01:00 +0000
                Re: thiS Guy benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-30 17:17 -0500
                Re: thiS Guy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-31 00:01 +0000

csiph-web