Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #610947

Re: thiS Guy

Show all headers | View raw

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 12/29/2016 8:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 12/28/2016 12:58 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 12/27/2016 6:11 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>>>>> BJ quacked Gosh Hardblow, That makes Bert EXACTLY like you! Say you
>>>>>> have an imaginary friend from the future like Bert does? I'm sure you
>>>>>> do. -----------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well since you believe in time travel to the past, you have lots of
>>>>>> choices for imaginary friends. Actually you don't even need time
>>>>>> travel... You believe in ghosts. Lol just go dig up a few
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since both you and Bert are totally ignorant of science you obviously do
>>>>> not know that the future can't cause the present. Hence it is impossible
>>>>> for Bert to have an imaginary friend who is really from the future. Of
>>>>> course you also are too ignorant to know that even if one could travel
>>>>> to the past, you can't change it because it's already happened and done
>>>>> with. You can only view it at best. You Hollywood types just get so
>>>>> excited when you start thinking about things you THINK are science.
>>>
>>>> Such as ghosts, ESP, remote viewing?
>>>
>>> More than a century of ESP research and peer reviewed remote viewing
>>> articles in Phys. Rev. and IEEE Proc. are nothing compared to your
>>> personal opinion with nothing to back it up. We are all so impressed
>>> with you and HVAC. Drooler.
>>
>> You have been give several references to prove this.
>>
>> My personal opinion has nothing to do with it kook.
>>
>>
> Meta-analysis has shown ESP positive results to be as much as a billion 
> to 1 times greater than chance. But you have your opinion and that 
> trumps all science. I take it you don't believe in quantum mechanics 
> either.

No investigation into the paranormal that has shown positive results
has every withstood critique by subsequent investigation kook.

You have been shown numreous references to prove this kook.

Science means repeatability of an experiment kook.

Opinion and belief have nothing to do with it kook.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: thiS Guy "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 12:44 -0800
  Re: thiS Guy "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-27 12:51 -0800
  Re: thiS Guy HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 13:21 -0800
    Re: thiS Guy benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-27 17:28 -0500
      Re: thiS Guy HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 15:11 -0800
        Re: thiS Guy benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-27 21:35 -0500
          Re: thiS Guy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-28 05:58 +0000
            Re: thiS Guy benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-29 17:22 -0500
              Re: thiS Guy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-30 01:00 +0000
                Re: thiS Guy benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-30 17:17 -0500
                Re: thiS Guy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-31 00:01 +0000

csiph-web