Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #728141

Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/19/2019 3:10 PM, benj wrote:
> On 2/19/2019 11:16 AM, Serg Io wrote:
>> On 2/19/2019 9:03 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 2/18/2019 11:51 PM, Serg Io wrote:
>>>> On 2/18/2019 8:11 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, February 18, 2019 at 10:21:40 AM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So all of physics is "settled science"!
>>>>>> Boy, you sure don't know much how science works for a "professor"!
>>>>>
>>>>> That is not what Sam said, and you know it... you just like to stir
>>>>> the shit up...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sam said SR, GR, and QM are theories.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      "settled science" is a journalistic phase used by
>>>>           Al Gore and The Warmettes
>>>>
>>> Obviously there needs to be a law forbidding the teaching of these
>>> things as "theories" just like there are laws demanding that evolution
>>> be taught as "fact".
>>
>>
>> agree,
>>        theoretical evolution vs factual evolution [show me the fossils]
>>          factual physics vs theoretical physics   [ugh]
>>
>> "settled science"  is like has sat too long, or settled to the bottom of
>> the fish tank.
>>
>>   I will send these questions to AOC, perhaps she may give her diving
>> guidance on these pressing issues.
>>
> 
> I'm sure she can supply a theory for a "green new fishtank"

one that uses no water, just paint a fish on the side

> 
>>
>>   [why do people elect total morons into leadership positions ? ],
> 
> 
> Because in politics facts don't matter. It's like journalism where the
> only thing that matters is "a good story" rather than truth.
> 

Dems are running using control of the media, (just paying them money
will do it)   all propaganda, no facts.   They need more people smoking
pot to 'believe'.

remember those full hollywood Hero movies that came out before a
politician would run, John Glen, and John Kennedy ?

Obama may have one; "The Choom Gang takes down Whitie"

Trump had his shows
Ronald Reagan had TV and Radio


...........meanwhile......BACK to PHYSICS..........

there is also

=>>  Notional Physics  and Imaginational Physics

which James McGinn tries to use, without any knowledge, to support his
Dehydrated Water Vapor Suppositoriness.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 09:23 -0800
  Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:21 -0500
    Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 19:03 +0000
    Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 18:11 -0800
      Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-18 22:51 -0600
        Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 10:03 -0500
          Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-19 10:16 -0600
            Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:10 -0500
              Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-19 16:33 -0600
          Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-02-19 14:21 -0800
  Truthiness isn't that important. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-18 13:11 -0800
    Re: Truthiness isn't that important. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-18 16:15 -0500
      Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:16 -0700
        Re: Truthiness isn't that important. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-18 22:28 +0000
          Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 15:42 -0700
            Re: Truthiness isn't that important. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-18 23:00 +0000
              Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 16:46 -0700
          Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-18 20:23 -0800
    Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:32 +0000
      Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-18 17:23 -0800
        Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 22:32 -0500
        Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-19 03:50 +0000
        Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 14:54 +0000
    Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 09:56 -0800
  Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-19 00:25 -0800
  Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-22 06:03 -0800
    Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 06:06 -0800
    Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 06:15 -0800
      Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-23 04:40 -0800

csiph-web