Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #728121

Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity

From benj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity
Date 2019-02-19 16:10 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <q4hrc0$1kbn$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <q4et3e$1eht$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e4def660-2f13-425e-8b12-b299f9e195f8@googlegroups.com> <q4g20m$1vn1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <q4h5rg$ddv$1@gioia.aioe.org> <q4ha5b$127l$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/19/2019 11:16 AM, Serg Io wrote:
> On 2/19/2019 9:03 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 2/18/2019 11:51 PM, Serg Io wrote:
>>> On 2/18/2019 8:11 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Monday, February 18, 2019 at 10:21:40 AM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So all of physics is "settled science"!
>>>>> Boy, you sure don't know much how science works for a "professor"!
>>>>
>>>> That is not what Sam said, and you know it... you just like to stir
>>>> the shit up...
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam said SR, GR, and QM are theories.
>>>
>>>
>>>      "settled science" is a journalistic phase used by
>>>           Al Gore and The Warmettes
>>>
>> Obviously there needs to be a law forbidding the teaching of these
>> things as "theories" just like there are laws demanding that evolution
>> be taught as "fact".
> 
> 
> agree,
>        theoretical evolution vs factual evolution [show me the fossils]
>          factual physics vs theoretical physics   [ugh]
> 
> "settled science"  is like has sat too long, or settled to the bottom of
> the fish tank.
> 
>   I will send these questions to AOC, perhaps she may give her diving
> guidance on these pressing issues.
>

I'm sure she can supply a theory for a "green new fishtank"

> 
>   [why do people elect total morons into leadership positions ? ],


Because in politics facts don't matter. It's like journalism where the 
only thing that matters is "a good story" rather than truth.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 09:23 -0800
  Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:21 -0500
    Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 19:03 +0000
    Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 18:11 -0800
      Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-18 22:51 -0600
        Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 10:03 -0500
          Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-19 10:16 -0600
            Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:10 -0500
              Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-19 16:33 -0600
          Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-02-19 14:21 -0800
  Truthiness isn't that important. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-18 13:11 -0800
    Re: Truthiness isn't that important. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-18 16:15 -0500
      Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:16 -0700
        Re: Truthiness isn't that important. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-18 22:28 +0000
          Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 15:42 -0700
            Re: Truthiness isn't that important. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-18 23:00 +0000
              Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 16:46 -0700
          Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-18 20:23 -0800
    Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:32 +0000
      Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-18 17:23 -0800
        Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 22:32 -0500
        Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-19 03:50 +0000
        Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 14:54 +0000
    Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 09:56 -0800
  Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-19 00:25 -0800
  Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-22 06:03 -0800
    Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 06:06 -0800
    Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 06:15 -0800
      Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-23 04:40 -0800

csiph-web