Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #728121
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity |
| Date | 2019-02-19 16:10 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <q4hrc0$1kbn$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <q4et3e$1eht$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e4def660-2f13-425e-8b12-b299f9e195f8@googlegroups.com> <q4g20m$1vn1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <q4h5rg$ddv$1@gioia.aioe.org> <q4ha5b$127l$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 2/19/2019 11:16 AM, Serg Io wrote: > On 2/19/2019 9:03 AM, benj wrote: >> On 2/18/2019 11:51 PM, Serg Io wrote: >>> On 2/18/2019 8:11 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Monday, February 18, 2019 at 10:21:40 AM UTC-8, benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> So all of physics is "settled science"! >>>>> Boy, you sure don't know much how science works for a "professor"! >>>> >>>> That is not what Sam said, and you know it... you just like to stir >>>> the shit up... >>>> >>> >>> >>> Sam said SR, GR, and QM are theories. >>> >>> >>> "settled science" is a journalistic phase used by >>> Al Gore and The Warmettes >>> >> Obviously there needs to be a law forbidding the teaching of these >> things as "theories" just like there are laws demanding that evolution >> be taught as "fact". > > > agree, > theoretical evolution vs factual evolution [show me the fossils] > factual physics vs theoretical physics [ugh] > > "settled science" is like has sat too long, or settled to the bottom of > the fish tank. > > I will send these questions to AOC, perhaps she may give her diving > guidance on these pressing issues. > I'm sure she can supply a theory for a "green new fishtank" > > [why do people elect total morons into leadership positions ? ], Because in politics facts don't matter. It's like journalism where the only thing that matters is "a good story" rather than truth.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 09:23 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:21 -0500
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 19:03 +0000
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 18:11 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-18 22:51 -0600
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 10:03 -0500
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-19 10:16 -0600
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:10 -0500
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-19 16:33 -0600
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-02-19 14:21 -0800
Truthiness isn't that important. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-18 13:11 -0800
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-18 16:15 -0500
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:16 -0700
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-18 22:28 +0000
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 15:42 -0700
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-18 23:00 +0000
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 16:46 -0700
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-18 20:23 -0800
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:32 +0000
Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-18 17:23 -0800
Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 22:32 -0500
Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-19 03:50 +0000
Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 14:54 +0000
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 09:56 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-19 00:25 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-22 06:03 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 06:06 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 06:15 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-23 04:40 -0800
csiph-web