Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #727906
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity |
| Date | 2019-02-18 13:21 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <q4et3e$1eht$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <75066954-ae16-4613-8da2-0a7537168a62@googlegroups.com> |
On 2/18/2019 12:23 PM, sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote: > Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity > > There has NEVER been an observation that contradicts a prediction of Einstein's Special and General Theories of Relativity. The theories remain fruitful tools of physics. > > Oh, and guess what -- the same can be said of the quantum mechanics. > > <smiling> > > Regards to all. > So all of physics is "settled science"! Boy, you sure don't know much how science works for a "professor"!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 09:23 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:21 -0500
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 19:03 +0000
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 18:11 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-18 22:51 -0600
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 10:03 -0500
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-19 10:16 -0600
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:10 -0500
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-19 16:33 -0600
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-02-19 14:21 -0800
Truthiness isn't that important. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-18 13:11 -0800
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-18 16:15 -0500
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:16 -0700
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-18 22:28 +0000
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 15:42 -0700
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-18 23:00 +0000
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 16:46 -0700
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-18 20:23 -0800
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:32 +0000
Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-18 17:23 -0800
Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 22:32 -0500
Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-19 03:50 +0000
Re: Which prevailed at the start of the Big Bang ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 14:54 +0000
Re: Truthiness isn't that important. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 09:56 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-19 00:25 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-22 06:03 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 06:06 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 06:15 -0800
Re: Comment of Einstein's Theory of Relativity Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-23 04:40 -0800
csiph-web