Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #727047

Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??...

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??...
Date 2019-02-13 15:43 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <q41dvl$1lgr$3@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <6f51d3ee-42a6-4e4c-9176-6dad2c1c376f@googlegroups.com> <q40ulv$1c5c$3@gioia.aioe.org> <5d1b92b2-28a4-4174-ad1a-5f697a98100d@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


<poraty6@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 1:22:43 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> <poraty6@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I heard  here 
>>> a genius   typical  parrot 
>>> who claim and teach us '' that fields 
>>> are 
>>> the last most basic(magic'') physical entities   that exist
>>> 
>>> do you agree with it ?
>>> 
>>> 2
>>> if not ''fields'' 
>>> than what is it the most(or one of )
>>> 
>>> most basic physical entity ??
>> 
>> Yes. Quantum fields are the most basic entity in the current thinking of
>> the world. 
> ====================I am vert glad that  you nominated yourself 
> for the speaker of thinkers of the world  

I’ve read the current books of those thinkers. They all say that. So yes,
this represents the position of physicists in the world. 

> 
> 2
> 
> what are the physical dimensions   
> of those fields ??
> 
> =TIA
> Y.P
> =====================
> 
>> 
>>> ---------------------------
>>> my assertion is 
>>> looking for the   most basic physical entity !
>>> can it be simple ??
>> 
>> Nature doesnt owe that.
> 
> ok we got here a new spokesman of  mother   nature  
>> 
>>> 
> ================================================ TIA
>  Y.Porat  
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-12 21:49 -0800
  ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 21:52 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 00:02 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 05:03 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 14:54 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:03 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:22 +0000
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:13 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:43 +0000
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:20 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:24 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:43 +0000
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 08:43 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 11:24 -0800
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:51 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-13 21:03 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:29 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 22:46 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:03 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 12:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:27 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:07 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 22:46 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:10 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:15 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 03:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 21:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 00:15 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 12:20 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 09:02 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 11:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 21:30 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 13:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:27 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 15:24 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:52 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:14 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 06:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:13 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 01:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 13:22 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 05:35 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 14:10 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 12:41 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 22:25 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 17:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 02:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 22:30 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:36 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 07:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 16:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 14:35 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 16:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 00:51 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 17:11 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 02:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 19:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 15:53 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 08:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:07 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:18 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:25 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 09:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:57 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:01 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:28 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 00:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 00:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:13 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 12:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 05:44 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:37 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 06:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 06:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 16:43 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 11:34 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:41 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 12:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 20:52 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 21:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 21:08 +0000
                My (non-vocalized) transcendental meditation chant is "nonsense", not "ohm". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 15:39 -0800
                Re: My (non-vocalized) transcendental meditation chant is "nonsense", not "ohm". Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-17 23:46 +0000
                When did your obsession with octogenarians begin ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 16:29 -0800
                Re: When did your obsession with octogenarians begin ? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:49 +0000
                GallopingInsanity Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 17:02 -0800
                Re: GallopingInsanity Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:28 +0000
                Re: GallopingInsanity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-18 15:47 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:05 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 20:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 07:59 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 18:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:56 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:33 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 02:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 04:44 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 19:59 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:02 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:14 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:48 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:01 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:31 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 15:11 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:05 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 15:15 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 13:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 23:56 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:52 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 03:04 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 19:31 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 12:41 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 05:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 15:11 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 10:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 19:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 11:32 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 12:40 -0700
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 20:42 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 13:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 23:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 16:18 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 01:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 19:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 14:55 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:15 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 09:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 18:40 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 12:05 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 20:30 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 12:55 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 21:26 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 13:58 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 22:18 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:35 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 03:15 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:31 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 23:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 15:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 21:10 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 12:42 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 08:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 18:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 16:50 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 23:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 02:28 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 07:32 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 13:52 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 15:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 16:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 21:33 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 04:03 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 01:27 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 09:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-25 11:17 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 05:45 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:55 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:59 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 10:04 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 07:27 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-26 22:40 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 00:08 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-27 00:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 07:28 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 08:52 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:27 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-21 03:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-19 15:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 23:56 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 21:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 20:55 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:03 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:54 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 23:56 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Earle Jones <earledjones@icloud.com> - 2019-02-15 17:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 07:37 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 14:36 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:51 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:44 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 18:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 04:57 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 22:57 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:24 -0500
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 18:32 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 21:47 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-14 12:33 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 18:05 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-15 18:41 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:13 -0800
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:25 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Buck Futter <DognPolisher@hotmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:37 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-14 12:34 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-16 18:17 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-17 21:50 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 20:47 -0800
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-18 21:35 -0800

csiph-web