Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #53564
| From | Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: The Danger of Systemd |
| Date | 2019-02-04 19:05 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <q3a2cs$ce7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <q39hss06nv@news2.newsguy.com> <q39kok$kbj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <q39m2402gm1@news3.newsguy.com> <slrnq5gnvl.a4g.BitTwister@wb.home.test> <q39o0902hij@news3.newsguy.com> |
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 16:07:37 +0000, F. Russell scribbled: > On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 09:53:24 -0600, Bit Twister vomited this verbiage > that I considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of > possible reasons: > >>> Systemd eliminates that free choice. >> >> Only if you pick a distribution which requires it to be installed. > > Once their BUS1 is forced into the kernel then there will be no way to > avoid systemd. > > Developers will no longer be willing or even able to maintain two > separate and alternative versions of their software. > > You will note that BUS1 is not mentioned in your cited docs. What you are talking about is called kdbus. And it ain't gonna happen, because Linus doesn't want it. -- With respect, = Aragorn =
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 14:23 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 15:06 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 15:20 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-02-04 19:27 +0100
Re: The Danger of Systemd flyer <snowflyer09o@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 15:12 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 15:34 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-02-04 09:53 -0600
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 16:07 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-02-04 19:05 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 19:14 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2019-02-05 14:00 +0200
Re: The Danger of Systemd Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-02-05 15:13 -0600
Re: The Danger of Systemd Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-05 16:32 -0500
Re: The Danger of Systemd Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2019-02-06 09:35 +0200
Re: The Danger of Systemd Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-02-05 21:35 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-04 17:04 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-02-04 19:11 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-04 12:15 -0500
Re: The Danger of Systemd "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-02-04 19:22 +0100
Re: The Danger of Systemd Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2019-02-06 22:08 +0100
Re: The Danger of Systemd "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-07 17:00 +0100
csiph-web