Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #53549
| From | "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: The Danger of Systemd |
| Date | 2019-02-04 16:07 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <q39o0902hij@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <q39hss06nv@news2.newsguy.com> <q39kok$kbj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <q39m2402gm1@news3.newsguy.com> <slrnq5gnvl.a4g.BitTwister@wb.home.test> |
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 09:53:24 -0600, Bit Twister vomited this verbiage that I considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible reasons: > >> Systemd eliminates that free choice. > > Only if you pick a distribution which requires it to be installed. > Once their BUS1 is forced into the kernel then there will be no way to avoid systemd. Developers will no longer be willing or even able to maintain two separate and alternative versions of their software. You will note that BUS1 is not mentioned in your cited docs.
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 14:23 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 15:06 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 15:20 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-02-04 19:27 +0100
Re: The Danger of Systemd flyer <snowflyer09o@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 15:12 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 15:34 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-02-04 09:53 -0600
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 16:07 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-02-04 19:05 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 19:14 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2019-02-05 14:00 +0200
Re: The Danger of Systemd Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-02-05 15:13 -0600
Re: The Danger of Systemd Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-05 16:32 -0500
Re: The Danger of Systemd Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2019-02-06 09:35 +0200
Re: The Danger of Systemd Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-02-05 21:35 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-04 17:04 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-02-04 19:11 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-04 12:15 -0500
Re: The Danger of Systemd "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-02-04 19:22 +0100
Re: The Danger of Systemd Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2019-02-06 22:08 +0100
Re: The Danger of Systemd "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-07 17:00 +0100
csiph-web