Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1211361
| From | ygardi@codeaurora.org |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] scsi: ufs: make the UFS variant a platform device |
| Date | 2015-08-22 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q02YW-9v-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pZyxQ-6Jf-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZyxQ-6Jf-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZHKO-3f1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> 2015-08-20 22:59 GMT+09:00 Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org>:
>> @@ -1036,7 +1037,7 @@ void ufs_qcom_clk_scale_notify(struct ufs_hba
>> *hba)
>> * The variant operations configure the necessary controller and PHY
>> * handshake during initialization.
>> */
>> -static const struct ufs_hba_variant_ops ufs_hba_qcom_vops = {
>> +static struct ufs_hba_variant_ops ufs_hba_qcom_vops = {
>
> It's better to keep const. In order to do this, we also need to put
> const to 'vops' member in struct ufs_hba and the second argument of
> ufshcd_pltfrm_init().
Why do you think it would be better to keep the vops as a const and have
the vops member in struct ufs_hba be const ?
I would say it is better to have the vops as is, and let each variany
decidehow it should behave.
>
>> +static void ufs_qcom_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + ufshcd_shutdown((struct ufs_hba *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev));
>> +}
>
> We don't need this function anymore since we have
> ufshcd_pltfrm_shutdown() now.
ok, as this variant shutdown is doing the same as pltform shutdown' it can
go away.
>
>> -static void ufshcd_pltfrm_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +void ufshcd_pltfrm_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> - ufshcd_shutdown((struct ufs_hba *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev));
>> + ufshcd_shutdown((struct ufs_hba *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev));
>
> Whitespace is used as code indent. There are same issues in
> this patch series, so I recommend running checkpatch.pl before
> sending patches.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 6/8] scsi: ufs: make the UFS variant a platform device Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org> - 2015-08-20 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] scsi: ufs: make the UFS variant a platform device Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] scsi: ufs: make the UFS variant a platform device ygardi@codeaurora.org - 2015-08-22 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] scsi: ufs: make the UFS variant a platform device Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] scsi: ufs: make the UFS variant a platform device ygardi@codeaurora.org - 2015-08-24 10:40 +0200
csiph-web