Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1159951
| From | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 11/18] jffs2: Convert jffs2_gcd_mtd kthread into the iterant API |
| Date | 2015-06-06 23:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pytFw-3E8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <py1pT-3Kb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <py1pT-3Kb-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 06/05, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> [*] In fact, there was a bug in the original code. It tried to process
> a non-existing signal when the system was freezing. See the common
> check for pending signal and freezing.
And another bug afaics:
> - case SIGSTOP:
> - jffs2_dbg(1, "%s(): SIGSTOP received\n",
> - __func__);
> - set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED);
> - schedule();
> - break;
This is obviously racy, we can miss SIGCONT.
Still I personally dislike the new kthread_sigaction() API. I agree,
a couple if signal helpers for kthreads make sense. Say,
void kthread_do_signal_stop(void)
{
spin_lock_irq(&curtent->sighand->siglock);
if (current->jobctl & JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED)
__set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED);
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
schedule();
}
and probably even "int kthread_signal_deque(void)".
But personally I do not think kthread_do_signal() makes a lot of sense...
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/18] jffs2: Convert jffs2_gcd_mtd kthread into the iterant API Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-06-06 23:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/18] jffs2: Convert jffs2_gcd_mtd kthread into the iterant API Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> - 2015-06-06 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/18] jffs2: Convert jffs2_gcd_mtd kthread into the iterant API Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-06-07 00:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/18] jffs2: Convert jffs2_gcd_mtd kthread into the iterant API Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> - 2015-06-07 00:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/18] jffs2: Convert jffs2_gcd_mtd kthread into the iterant API Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-06-07 01:10 +0200
csiph-web