Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #714840

Re: Missing mass

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Missing mass
Date 2018-11-26 17:30 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <pthajc$fml$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <578b8b52-0a21-4015-a3e1-a00eac667160@googlegroups.com> <ptgv5m$f75$1@gioia.aioe.org> <106eccb0-a48a-4bdd-8fe1-c4965ba4090c@googlegroups.com> <pth5ov$rkg$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes:

>john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Odd
>> “The problem with not knowing anything, John, is that you’ll naturally 
>> assume a lot of things are unknown, which apparently gives you the sense”
>> Unseen was the word I used.
>> You haven’t addressed that or shown that you even know what I’m talking about.
>> Normal, for you
>> 

>Yes I did address it. The search for missing mass and the hypothesis of
>dark matter is driven by an excess of gravitation compared to the observed
>mass. 

>You propose that this mass is hidden inside planets like Jupiter and
>Saturn. 

>The problem is, there is no excess of gravitation observed for those
>planets. The mass we have for those planets is exactly what is needed for
>accounting for the orbits of the satellites. 

>Now you say, put a lot of extra mass in those planets but make the
>gravitational effect of that mass hidden. What for? Now you have missing
>mass that can’t account for any excess gravitation because you say the
>gravitation from that excess mass is hidden. 

>Your ignorance and lack of education is only exceeded by the silliness of
>your brain farts. 

John actually has the problem BACKWARDS.

The "missing mass" problem is that there seems to be MORE gravitational
attraction for stars in a galaxy than can be explained by the observed
mass.  In other words, not enough mass to explain the rotation curves.

John's LeSage gravity claims there is MORE mass in stars and planets such
as Jupiter but gravitational shielding makes its gravity LESS than it
should be. Jupiter's gravity is LESS than its mass should show.

So John somehow thinks that gravity being DECREASED by gravitational 
shielding somehow explains there being TOO MUCH gravity to explain 
galactic rotation curves!

WTF, John!

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Missing mass john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 05:14 -0800
  Re: Missing mass Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 14:15 +0000
    Re: Missing mass john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 07:09 -0800
      Re: Missing mass Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 16:08 +0000
        Re: Missing mass moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-26 17:30 +0000
          Re: Missing mass mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-26 10:27 -0800
  Re: Missing mass moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-26 15:44 +0000

csiph-web