Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #713310
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Analysis of climate models |
| Date | 2018-11-18 22:46 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pstf7i$j1p$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <shefc3nptn.fsf@lnx231.classe.cornell.edu> <f15880f6-d12c-4d4c-9795-7ef7a4115f94@googlegroups.com> <9d6f715a-8aa7-4436-a5b3-791e0aaf90fb@googlegroups.com> <psss6t$1r37$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pstcqi$he4$1@dont-email.me> |
On 11/18/2018 10:05 PM, Libor Striz wrote: > Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> Wrote in message: > > >> prediction using models; > >> it is obvious that weather or climate is not an initial value problem, nor is it a boundary value problem. That implies that the Model is accurate. > > It is wrong conclusion. > > Inaccurate Initial and boundary values have so big impact, that it > does not matter much if the model is accurate or not. > Completeness and accuracy of data have is much more > important. > > Even if models were perfect, the dynamic instability nature of the > modelled system progressively amplifies data input errors to > chaotic results. > > It has nice analogy in putting a small ball on top of a big ball > and predicting the direction and distance where it will stop. > > > You can use as much accurate model as you want, all stands and > falls on accuracy of the initial ball position. > > agree, Balancing a pencil gets into Plancks constant, HUP, others. No matter how clever you are, and no matter how much money you spend on the newest, cutting-edge pencil-balancing equipment, you can never get a pencil to balance for more than about four seconds. problem https://www.physics.harvard.edu/uploads/files/undergrad/probweek/prob3.pdf solution https://www.physics.harvard.edu/uploads/files/undergrad/probweek/sol3.pdf
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 10:22 -0700
UsedCar salesman cite facts. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-31 12:37 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-31 14:49 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:00 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 18:32 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 06:32 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 02:06 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 07:33 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 10:08 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 15:33 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:22 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-14 00:28 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 16:47 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-01 10:16 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:16 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 16:02 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-02 20:19 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:56 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:39 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 12:59 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 14:45 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:07 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:34 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:09 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 09:50 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 19:17 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 07:16 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 21:23 +0000
Re: Analysis of climate models Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-11-02 05:21 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:04 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-02 08:31 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Dan Riley <dan131riley@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:15 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:40 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:13 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-18 17:22 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 17:48 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-19 05:05 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-18 22:46 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-19 06:59 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 07:42 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:58 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 19:17 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 12:22 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-20 21:02 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 11:01 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 12:58 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:10 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 12:04 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-20 22:02 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-19 07:00 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:00 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-20 21:28 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 10:38 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-25 00:53 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:21 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Dan Riley <dan131riley@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:08 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:23 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:00 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:04 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 14:51 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:59 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-19 07:27 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:06 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 11:59 -0500
csiph-web