Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #713291
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Analysis of climate models |
| Date | 2018-11-18 17:22 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <psss6t$1r37$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <c94395fc-09b1-445a-b53c-1f3ad6412a74@googlegroups.com> <vifotdplsqi3sh4vlrqig095dah3hllh1o@4ax.com> <shefc3nptn.fsf@lnx231.classe.cornell.edu> <f15880f6-d12c-4d4c-9795-7ef7a4115f94@googlegroups.com> <9d6f715a-8aa7-4436-a5b3-791e0aaf90fb@googlegroups.com> |
On 11/13/2018 3:13 PM, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 3:40:19 PM UTC-5, Claudius Denk (aka james McGinn) wrote: >> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 2:15:51 PM UTC-7, Dan Riley wrote: >>> Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> writes: >>>> A modeling "experiment" observes a computer program. Said computer >>>> program embodies an approximation of an incomplete understanding of a >>>> limited number of the relevant interacting natural processes, to a >>>> finite number of decimal places that can't track even one chaotic >>>> process very far before the program's output will diverge wildly from >>>> how Nature actually behaves. >>> >>> This is basically the "we can't model the weather for more than a few >>> days, how can we expect to model the climate" argument. One answer is >>> that modeling the weather is an initial value problem, while modeling >>> the climate is a boundary value problem. Well posed boundary value >>> models don't diverge wildly. >>> >>> -dan >> >> This is an absurdly stupid comment. A "boundary value problem" is just a more vaguely defined, "initial value problem." Climate scientists are experts in this kind of evasive, meaningless rhetoric. > > Now James, be polite. > Please. > > ed > prediction using models; it is obvious that weather or climate is not an initial value problem, nor is it a boundary value problem. That implies that the Model is accurate. however, both weather and climate involve turbulent processes, and we can only grossly model them with resulting poor accuracy.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 10:22 -0700
UsedCar salesman cite facts. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-31 12:37 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-31 14:49 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:00 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 18:32 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 06:32 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 02:06 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 07:33 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 10:08 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 15:33 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:22 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-14 00:28 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 16:47 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-01 10:16 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:16 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 16:02 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-02 20:19 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:56 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:39 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 12:59 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 14:45 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:07 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:34 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:09 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 09:50 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 19:17 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 07:16 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 21:23 +0000
Re: Analysis of climate models Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-11-02 05:21 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:04 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-02 08:31 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Dan Riley <dan131riley@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:15 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:40 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:13 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-18 17:22 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 17:48 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-19 05:05 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-18 22:46 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-19 06:59 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 07:42 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:58 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 19:17 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 12:22 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-20 21:02 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 11:01 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 12:58 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:10 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 12:04 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-20 22:02 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-19 07:00 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:00 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-20 21:28 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 10:38 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-25 00:53 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:21 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Dan Riley <dan131riley@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:08 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:23 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:00 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:04 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 14:51 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:59 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-19 07:27 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:06 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 11:59 -0500
csiph-web