Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #154373

Re: HP split into two

From Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com>
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: HP split into two
Date 2015-11-11 13:01 -0500
Organization Whatsamatta U
Message-ID <proto-0806CE.13012811112015@news.panix.com> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <n1fdmj$rj2$1@dont-email.me> <20151105140806.3f09ee42a41bae33dc1b7668@eircom.net> <KYWdnWLCj_MbWqbLnZ2dnUU78bednZ2d@giganews.com> <20151106101614.39849b10d9da1017c82afdd2@eircom.net> <n1injp02or2@news6.newsguy.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <n1injp02or2@news6.newsguy.com>,
 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:

> > 	Yes but sadly there's a big profit spike available if you have a
> > name for quality and suddenly appear in the middle of the low cost market
> > with stuff that looks good even if it's really crud. If you're really
> > clever you fork off the business and sell it just before people start to
> > catch on.
> 
> That sounds like the most concise history of HP that I've heard.
> Do you have a book coming out?

Apparent profit from selling your good name. It's been known about 
probably long before I was in college. Back then it was creditors that 
would take over a business and require it to lower quality and live off
the name. Now, it's the executives who want the stock price up so they
can get their bonus.

Blech!

-- 
Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greed. Me.

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

HP split into two jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2015-11-04 23:25 +0000
  Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-04 18:36 -0500
    Re: HP split into two Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-11-04 22:58 -0500
      Re: HP split into two philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-11-05 05:16 -0600
        Re: HP split into two David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-11-05 11:28 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-11-05 11:44 +0000
            Re: HP split into two David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-11-05 11:52 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-11-06 09:40 -0800
          Re: HP split into two scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-05 14:15 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Uncle Steve <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 07:48 -0500
        Re: HP split into two "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-11-05 07:37 -0600
          Re: HP split into two "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-05 13:50 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2015-11-05 20:47 -0500
        Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-05 14:08 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-05 13:00 -0500
            Re: HP split into two "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-05 18:44 +0000
              Re: HP split into two hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) - 2015-11-08 18:03 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-05 21:16 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-11-06 08:02 +0000
              Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 09:20 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-11-06 09:53 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 11:58 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-11-06 15:19 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 19:30 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-06 15:54 -0500
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 23:02 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-11-07 10:35 +0000
                Re: HP split into two jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-07 13:45 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-07 13:59 +0000
                Re: HP split into two jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-08 13:46 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-05 21:19 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-06 10:16 +0000
              Re: HP split into two Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-11-06 17:22 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 13:01 -0500
              Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:58 -0500
            Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:57 -0500
              Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-12 00:57 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-11 23:33 -0500
                Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-12 13:49 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2015-11-12 10:55 -0700
                Re: HP split into two hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-11-13 09:45 -0800
                Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-13 12:58 -0500
                Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-14 06:20 +0000
        Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:50 -0500

csiph-web