Re: Arguing with lunatics

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Arguing with lunatics
Date	2016-04-26 19:06 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ppq4vc-ruj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <7IKdnajACJSAwIPKnZ2dnUU7-THNnZ2d@giganews.com> <8k42vc-h7b.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <S-KdndWiA-b74IPKnZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com> <pnd2vc-e3c.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <Q6CdnUHrIOOeLYLKnZ2dnUU7-WfNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
> news:pnd2vc-e3c.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:8k42vc-h7b.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:77mquc-m4g.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Who here thinks a jet plane
>>>>>>> full of fuel can, all by itself,
>>>>>>> bring down a building like
>>>>>>> WTC1, and who thinks falling
>>>>>>> debris and "scattered fires"
>>>>>>> can bring down a building like WTC7?
>>>>>>> (How did the fires start?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From the airplane crash, idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> But what type of airplane does not have shadows and consisted of 3
>>>>> different
>>>>> images?
>>>>
>>>> The kind in your delusions.
>>>
>>> You are a complete idiot because you didn't even check to see that the 
>>> bogus
>>> 9/11 attack involved the use of 3 different CGIs as proven by the 3
>>> different images from what should have been the exact same jet.
>>
>> While you are a totally delusional kook.
>>
>> Did you ever figure out the explosive energy difference between a
>> "MRR nuke" and any other kind of nuclear explosive?
> 
> ROTFLMAO because you can't rely on the seismic readings at Ground Zero 
> because they were all way too small especially when WTC7 was supposed to 
> have crashed to the ground because a jackhammer could make those tiny 
> surface waves too.

Did you ever figure out the difference between force and energy and the
energy of a jackhammer?

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 14:53 -0500
  Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 20:11 +0000
    Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 16:27 -0500
      Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 21:37 +0000
        Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 12:58 -0500
          Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 20:56 +0000
            Re: Arguing with lunatics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 14:45 -0700
              Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 22:46 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 13:07 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 18:35 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:25 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-25 20:34 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:57 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 21:12 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:03 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 19:50 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-01 12:57 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-01 19:39 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-04-25 18:04 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 17:23 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 16:50 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-25 22:41 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 21:10 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-26 13:13 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-26 19:06 +0000
              Re: Arguing with lunatics ClutterFreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 18:08 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:29 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics ClutterFreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 14:08 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-25 14:53 -0700
              Re: Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 08:33 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 06:41 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-23 12:58 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-23 12:33 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 10:56 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-23 23:29 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-23 22:42 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-24 00:36 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 13:10 -0500

csiph-web