Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #474389

Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation

Show all headers | View raw

kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> According to SR the rate of accumulating clock seconds by two clocks in
> relative motion is reciprocal. In other words, “A” predicts “B”
> accumulating clock seconds at a rate of 1/gamma and “B” predicts that “A”
> accumulating clock seconds at a rate of 1/gamma. This is known as “mutual
> time dilation”. The problem is: This reciprocity is never observed experimentally. 

Untrue. 

> Clocks will accumulate different number of clock seconds after a journey. 

That’s not the case where it is observed. 

> This means that either “A” or “B” will accumulate clock seconds at a
> faster rate during relative motion and thus no asserted reciprocity.
> 
> The solution to the above problem is that each observer must include the
> possibility that the observed clock can run faster (accumulates clock
> seconds at a faster rate) than his clock. In other words, “A” predicts
> that “B” accumulate clock seconds at a slower rate by a factor of 1/gamma
> or at a faster rate by a factor of gamma. But only one of “A’s”
> prediction is correct. The above concept of time gives rise to a new
> theory of relativity called IRT. A paper on IRT is available in the
> following link: http://www/model (http://www/model)mechanics.org/2015irt.pdf
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-07 07:06 -0700
  Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-07 15:56 +0000
    Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 09:18 -0700
    Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 09:21 -0700
      Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 10:38 -0700
    Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-07 17:14 -0700
      Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-08 01:50 +0000
        Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-08 12:06 -0700
          Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-08 20:31 +0000
            Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-10-08 23:22 +0200
            Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-09 06:28 -0700
              Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation Paul Gish <uop@uwrwuao.tc> - 2018-10-09 14:02 +0000
  Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 19:19 +0000
    Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 12:33 -0700
      Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 20:36 +0000
        Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 14:03 -0700
  Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 12:51 -0700
    Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-10-08 23:23 +0200
      Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-08 22:52 -0700

csiph-web