Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #474427
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation |
| Date | 2018-10-08 01:50 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <pped4p$r29$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <cb7ba971-79e1-4c35-990f-c0bde1f13b36@googlegroups.com> <ppdabp$bje$1@pcls7.std.com> <b3f4e722-9c34-4349-a234-c71d1e525cf3@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:56:43 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >> >The solution to the above problem >> No, Stupid Ken, there is no problem, except in your addled mind. >> >is that each observer must include the possibility that the observed >> >clock can run faster (accumulates clock seconds at a faster rate) than >> >his clock. >> Wrong. Such a theory cannot handle the following problem. (If you >> disagree, show us!) >> 3 rockets leave the origin in the XY plane at the same time. They all >> move at the same speed, as measured at the origin O. Rocket A moves along >> the +x direction. Rocket B moves at a 120 degree angle to Rocket A/the x >> axis, in the XY plane. Rocket C moves at a 240 degree angle to A (or 120 >> degrees in the opposite direction), also in the XY plane. Because of >> geometry, Rockets B and C are also at a 120 degree angle to each other. >> B >> \ >> \ >> O------A >> / >> / >> C >> Remember, all 3 rockets move at the same velocity as seen from O. >No Moron, A, B and C cannot use O as reference for velocity wrt each other. Why not? They left from O. >> Now, A measures the clock rates of B and C. A measures B's clock as >> ticking at exactly half the rate of A's clock. A measures C's clock as >> ticking at exactly half the rate of A's clock. In other words, >> gamma=2 in both cases. >No moron, A does not measure B's clock rate....he predicts. And why couldn't A measure? >> Tell us. Using your IRT, what does B measure when measuring the rate of >> A's clock? What does C measure when measuring the rate of A's clock? >IRT says: <snip empty blather> I see that IRT, or you, are unable to make any predictions from my initial conditions. Just as I thought. Just as well, since if you did, you'd quickly find a contradiction and the problem isn't doable. Meanwhile, SR has no problem with this situation.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-07 07:06 -0700
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-07 15:56 +0000
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 09:18 -0700
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 09:21 -0700
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 10:38 -0700
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-07 17:14 -0700
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-08 01:50 +0000
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-08 12:06 -0700
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-08 20:31 +0000
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-10-08 23:22 +0200
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-09 06:28 -0700
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation Paul Gish <uop@uwrwuao.tc> - 2018-10-09 14:02 +0000
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 19:19 +0000
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 12:33 -0700
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 20:36 +0000
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 14:03 -0700
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 12:51 -0700
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-10-08 23:23 +0200
Re: Rejecting the SR concept of mutual time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-08 22:52 -0700
csiph-web