Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #472956
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) |
| Date | 2018-09-25 01:20 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <poc2hb$2lc$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <7be9efb0-4e4c-4e57-9180-5e38058f3261@googlegroups.com> <pob5v7$mau$1@gioia.aioe.org> <8c7126a4-c6e3-4287-a3cd-12bb8d23fb91@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 1:13:15 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of relativity >>> called Improved Relativity Theory (IRT): >>> >>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015irt.pdf >>> >>> The differences between IRT and SRT and LET are as follows: >>> >>> 1. IRT says that space is occupied by a structured aether called the >>> E-Matrix. In other words, the E-Matrix is space. The unique structured of >>> the E-Matrix enables it to transmit light isotropically in all directions >>> regardless of the motion of the source. >> >> In other words, you have simply renamed spacetime. Renaming accomplishes >> nothing physically. > > No transmission of light in the E-Matrix is based on absolute time. > Transmission of light in spacetime is not even defined Of course it is! That’s what electrodynamics is all about. > and in any case it is based on flexible time. >> >>> >>> 2. Time in IRT is absolute and the passage of absolute time is >>> insensitive to motion. In other words, the rate of passage of absolute >>> time is the same in all frames of reference. However, there is no clock >>> time unit (including a clock second) that represents the same amount of >>> absolute time different frames. This causes a clock to accumulate clock >>> seconds at different rates, in different frames, according to its state >>> of absolute motion--the higher is the state of absolute motion of the >>> clock the higher is the absolute time content of its clock second. This >>> gives rise to the observed concept of clock time dilation. >>> >>> 3. In IRT the material length of a meter stick is a universal constant in >>> all frames of reference. However, the light-path-length (LPL: the length >>> light must travel to cover the length of a moving meter stick) is >>> predicted to be 1/gamma meter. This prediction is based on the assumption >>> that the LPL of the observer’s meter stick is its material length. >> >> For the previous two, you postulate absolute length and absolute time but >> there are no instruments that can measure these. This is because, according >> to you, all objects are in absolute motion and therefore no clock reads >> absolute time and no meter stick reads absolute length. This is therefore >> an unmeasurable quantity, and therefore not a testable hypothesis. > > Absolute length in IRT is material length. And absolute time is a defined quantity A defined quantity that is not measurable is not a testable hypothesis. > --for example any observer can claim that his clock second represents a > specific amount of absolute time and he uses the LT to transform his > specific unit of absolute time another frame and the result is 1/gamma > second--this means that 1/gamma second on a moving clock contains the > same amount of absolute time as 1 second on the observer’s clock. > > The GPS uses absolute time to synch the GPS clock with the ground clock. > Before the launch the GPS second is set to have 4.4647 more periods of > Cs 133 radiation than the ground clock second. This is designed to make > the GPS second at it location contains the same amount absolute time as > the ground clock second. This means that the GPS is continually in synch > with the group clock interns of absolute time. > > Absolute motion was detected by several past experiments and new > experiments to detect absolute motion are proposed in the following link: > http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015experiment.pdf > >> >>> >>> 4. An IRT observer does not assume that his clock accumulates clock >>> seconds at a faster rate than a clock moving wrt him and the LPL of his >>> meter stick is shorter than a meter stick moving wrt him. He must include >>> the possibilities that the clock moving wrt him is accumulating clock >>> seconds at a faster rate and that the LPL of a meter stick moving wrt him >>> is shorter than the LPL of his meter stick. >>> >>> The above premises of IRT eliminate all the paradoxes of SRT. More >>> importantly, it gives rise to the IRT math that is valid in all >>> environments, including gravity. >>> >> >> You have done no “IRT math” to show that it is valid. None. > > IRT math is shown in the link that started this thread. Writing down equations is not doing the math. > >> And what paradoxes of SRT? > > The twin paradox, the pole/barn paradox, the train/tunnel paradox and the > bug/rivet paradox.....etc. > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 17:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-24 12:38 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 01:20 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 01:38 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 06:47 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:54 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 02:39 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 06:32 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:57 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 02:39 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-24 18:17 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Hilton Packett <wod@wcothr.ce> - 2018-09-24 20:09 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:29 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Hilton Packett <wod@wcothr.ce> - 2018-09-25 22:29 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) herbertglazier0@gmail.com - 2018-09-25 16:55 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 20:11 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-26 04:11 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-26 14:00 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-26 21:29 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 01:10 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-27 06:47 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:37 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 13:18 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 22:05 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 08:11 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 15:25 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-29 20:03 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:03 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-30 19:07 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:52 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-01 11:46 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:30 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-02 07:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:08 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 08:37 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-29 09:20 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 15:00 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:31 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-01 11:51 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:30 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-02 07:21 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:08 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-03 06:03 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-03 13:38 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-03 09:10 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 07:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-03 05:59 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 07:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 06:20 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 07:10 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-28 16:45 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:39 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-26 13:57 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-27 12:46 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 06:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 06:56 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 09:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:44 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 09:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:51 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 14:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:47 -0700
csiph-web