Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #471916

Re: The false premises of current theories

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: The false premises of current theories
Date	2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pnj72k$77d$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(10 earlier) <080b6420-6190-46a9-9c82-7ad76a17922f@googlegroups.com> <bf1f452e-3d0d-4f15-b355-41c89af9631f@googlegroups.com> <de949cfa-4b6a-44ae-a083-e4adb024704d@googlegroups.com> <pnelqe$11if$2@gioia.aioe.org> <55a76fe2-8768-4127-81a2-c2e4f5e89494@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 5:45:54 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 2:36:34 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 7:26:43 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 11:31:36 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 9:08:50 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 1:05:07 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 10:51:44 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The false premises of the current theories that led generations of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase. Specifically, these false
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> premises failed to lead physicists to come up with a unified theory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all the forces
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A summary of the false premises of current theories:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In quantum mechanics, specifically the QFT, a material object will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project a field throughout space 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is incorrect. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are a woodworker....You are not qualified.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> And you are a chemical engineer. You are no more qualified than me.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore you are unqualified. 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Except that I don’t make unsupported statements.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Of course you do. You always refer to your own theory. Referring to your
>>>>>>>>>> own theory is not a supporting statement of your theory. 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Nothing wrong with that when my theory is superior.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Providing calculated predictions WOULD be a supporting statement because
>>>>>>>>>> the numbers could be checked against measurement. But you haven’t provided
>>>>>>>>>> those. 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You are an unqualified chemical engineer trying to pretend to do physics.  
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I got 2 patents and I developed numerous products for the auto and
>>>>>>>>> construction industries. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This does not make you qualified to do physics. 
>>>>>>>> You should be satisfied with your industrial accomplishments and not
>>>>>>>> pretend to be qualified as a physicist. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I didn’t pretend--I developed Model Mechanics a complete theory of the universe.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You are not qualified to develop a physical theory. You have no idea how to
>>>>>> do that properly and you don’t know even basic physics. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Pretending to be a doctor doesn’t make you a doctor. Pretending to be a
>>>>>> lawyer doesn’t make you a lawyer. Pretending to be a physicist doesn’t make
>>>>>> you a physicist. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You are a retired chemical engineer with some industrial accomplishments.
>>>>>> You are not a qualified physicist. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> For the last 100 years Physicists are confining their thinkings inside
>>>>> the box, such as force messengers and curvature of spacetime, for the 
>>>>> transmission of the various types of forces and that’s why they failed
>>>>> to come up with a unified theory for all the forces.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes but you are not the one to have solved this problem. 
>>> 
>>> Yes I am the one and Model Mechanics is the result.
>>> 
>>>> Progress is always
>>>> accomplished by knowing what went on before: you have to study physics first.
>>>> Without it all your attempts will miss the mark and are a total waste of time.
>>> 
>>> That’s inside the box thinking.
>>> 
>> 
>> Schizophrenia is out of the box thinking. 
>> Drooling-on-a-park-bench babbling is thinking out of the box. 
> 
> If schizophrenia is able to come up with a theory such as Model Mechanics
> then I welcome him.
> 

Lol



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 06:57 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 07:41 -0700
    Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 17:14 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 14:51 +0000
    Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 15:24 -0700
      Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 22:53 +0000
        Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 09:33 -0700
          Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:05 +0000
            Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 05:09 -0700
              Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 13:08 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 07:54 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 15:31 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 13:40 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 01:16 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:26 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 11:36 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 12:27 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 12:47 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:26 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-15 14:39 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 11:14 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 02:16 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-16 10:18 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:11 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-18 22:00 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-19 08:45 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 09:23 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:19 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaws.np> - 2018-09-20 15:26 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-21 06:13 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:34 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:45 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:35 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-15 08:24 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 21:26 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-14 19:02 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:41 -0700
            Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:39 -0700
              Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 11:38 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 12:29 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:45 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:33 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 11:30 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 19:08 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-19 08:42 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 17:12 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-21 06:33 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 15:00 +0000
          Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000
            Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-11 19:07 +0000
      Re: The false premises of current theories rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 19:21 -0700
        Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 09:31 -0700
        Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-11 13:08 -0700
          Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-11 20:15 +0000
            Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-11 16:41 -0700
              Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-12 16:30 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-10 17:25 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-10 10:33 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 19:23 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 13:07 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 16:21 -0700
    Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:30 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 18:06 -0700
    Re: The false premises of current theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 04:39 +0200
      Re: The false premises of current theories consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 21:16 -0700
        Re: The false premises of current theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 10:48 +0200

csiph-web