Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #471696

Re: The false premises of current theories

Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Date 2018-09-13 12:27 -0700
References (7 earlier) <pnb34m$pb2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0eb7cadf-c271-4f89-b8be-83c83744d961@googlegroups.com> <pnbbgl$18tl$1@gioia.aioe.org> <080b6420-6190-46a9-9c82-7ad76a17922f@googlegroups.com> <bf1f452e-3d0d-4f15-b355-41c89af9631f@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <de949cfa-4b6a-44ae-a083-e4adb024704d@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: The false premises of current theories
From kenseto <setoken@att.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 2:36:34 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> On Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 7:26:43 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 11:31:36 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 9:08:50 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> > > >>> On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 1:05:07 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 10:51:44 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> The false premises of the current theories that led generations of
> > > >>>>>>>>> physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase. Specifically, these false
> > > >>>>>>>>> premises failed to lead physicists to come up with a unified theory
> > > >>>>>>>>> for all the forces
> > > >>>>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>>>> A summary of the false premises of current theories:
> > > >>>>>>>>> In quantum mechanics, specifically the QFT, a material object will
> > > >>>>>>>>> project a field throughout space 
> > > >>>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>>> That is incorrect. 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> You are a woodworker....You are not qualified.
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> And you are a chemical engineer. You are no more qualified than me.
> > > >>>>>> Therefore you are unqualified. 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> Except that I don’t make unsupported statements.
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Of course you do. You always refer to your own theory. Referring to your
> > > >>>> own theory is not a supporting statement of your theory. 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Nothing wrong with that when my theory is superior.
> > > >>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Providing calculated predictions WOULD be a supporting statement because
> > > >>>> the numbers could be checked against measurement. But you haven’t provided
> > > >>>> those. 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> You are an unqualified chemical engineer trying to pretend to do physics.  
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> I got 2 patents and I developed numerous products for the auto and
> > > >>> construction industries. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> This does not make you qualified to do physics. 
> > > >> You should be satisfied with your industrial accomplishments and not
> > > >> pretend to be qualified as a physicist. 
> > > > 
> > > > I didn’t pretend--I developed Model Mechanics a complete theory of the universe.
> > > 
> > > You are not qualified to develop a physical theory. You have no idea how to
> > > do that properly and you don’t know even basic physics. 
> > > 
> > > Pretending to be a doctor doesn’t make you a doctor. Pretending to be a
> > > lawyer doesn’t make you a lawyer. Pretending to be a physicist doesn’t make
> > > you a physicist. 
> > > 
> > > You are a retired chemical engineer with some industrial accomplishments.
> > > You are not a qualified physicist. 
> > 
> > For the last 100 years Physicists are confining their thinkings inside the box, such as force messengers and curvature of spacetime, for the  transmission of the various types of forces and that’s why they failed to come up with a unified theory for all the forces.
> 
> Yes but you are not the one to have solved this problem. 

Yes I am the one and Model Mechanics is the result.

>Progress is always
> accomplished by knowing what went on before: you have to study physics first.
> Without it all your attempts will miss the mark and are a total waste of time.

That’s inside the box thinking.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 06:57 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 07:41 -0700
    Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 17:14 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 14:51 +0000
    Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 15:24 -0700
      Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 22:53 +0000
        Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 09:33 -0700
          Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:05 +0000
            Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 05:09 -0700
              Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 13:08 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 07:54 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 15:31 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 13:40 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 01:16 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:26 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 11:36 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 12:27 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 12:47 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:26 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-15 14:39 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 11:14 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 02:16 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-16 10:18 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:11 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-18 22:00 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-19 08:45 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 09:23 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:19 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaws.np> - 2018-09-20 15:26 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-21 06:13 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:34 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:45 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:35 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-15 08:24 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 21:26 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-14 19:02 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:41 -0700
            Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:39 -0700
              Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 11:38 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 12:29 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:45 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:33 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 11:30 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 19:08 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-19 08:42 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 17:12 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-21 06:33 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 15:00 +0000
          Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000
            Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-11 19:07 +0000
      Re: The false premises of current theories rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 19:21 -0700
        Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 09:31 -0700
        Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-11 13:08 -0700
          Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-11 20:15 +0000
            Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-11 16:41 -0700
              Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-12 16:30 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-10 17:25 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-10 10:33 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 19:23 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 13:07 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 16:21 -0700
    Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:30 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 18:06 -0700
    Re: The false premises of current theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 04:39 +0200
      Re: The false premises of current theories consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 21:16 -0700
        Re: The false premises of current theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 10:48 +0200

csiph-web