Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #702118
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: The false premises of current physics |
| Date | 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pn8u3a$1ce5$3@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <7e97008c-090c-4c46-981f-fc78e59b2ead@googlegroups.com> <pn6sl7$5h0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f0bf2ea6-107e-4a25-8e29-ab88e5f48884@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> The false premises of the current theories that led generations of >>> physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase. Specifically, these false >>> premises failed to lead physicists to come up with a unified theory for all the forces >>> >>> A summary of the false premises of current theories: >>> In quantum mechanics, specifically the QFT, a material object will >>> project a field throughout space >> >> That is an incorrect description. > > You are a woodworker.....you are not qualified. You are a retired chemical engineer. You are no more qualified than me. > >> >>> and virtual particles in the form of bosons will pop in and out of this >>> field. These bosons will act as force messengers to affect an appropriate >>> force to the interacting object. The force messengers for all the forces >>> can be summarized as follows: >>> The strong force messengers are the gluons. The existence of gluon has >>> not been found experimentally. >> >> Incorrect, evidence has been found experimentally. >> >>> >>> The force messengers for the electroweak force are: W+, W- and Z0. These >>> force messengers have been found experimentally. >> >> That’s correct. >> >>> >>> The force messengers for the electromagnetic force are the photons. The >>> virtual photons have been found experimentally. >> >> That’s correct. >> >>> >>> The force messengers for gravity are the gravitons. Graviton has not been >>> found experimentally. >> >> That’s correct. >> >> So summarizing, the force carrier bosons for three of four basic >> interactions have been found experimentally, and moreover those have the >> exact features predicted by the theory. And on the basis of this remarkable >> progress since the 1950s, barely six decades, you are declaring quantum >> field theory a dismal failure with false premises? How can a theory with >> false premises be so spectacularly confirmed by experiment? Is your idea >> that if a theory doesn’t have all its components and predictions confirmed >> by experiment in five years then it’s a failure? >> >>> In fact, the notion of gravitons for the force of gravity has been a >>> total failure mathematically. This means that there is no valid theory >>> of quantum gravity. >>> >>> Einstein’s premise of gravity is simply that the interacting objects >>> follow the curvature of space-time. There is no physical cause of gravity >>> in Einstein’s description. >> >> Incorrect. >> >>> In other words, GRT is merely a mathematical description of the paths >>> followed by the interacting objects. >>> >>> I came to the conclusion that there is one physical model of our universe >>> that can replace these divergent false premises of GRT and QFT. The >>> result of an intense search for such physical model for the past twenty >>> years is: Model Mechanics. Model Mechanics posits that all the particles, >>> all the forces and all the processes of nature are the result of >>> different absolute motions of the fundamental S-Particles in a structured >>> and elastic ether called the E-Matrix. The detailed description of Model >>> Mechanics is available in Chapter 3 of my book in the following link: >>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2016ibook.pdf >>> >>> The main feature of Model Mechanics are as follows: >>> It offers a realistic origin of the universe. >>> It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. >>> It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. >>> It provides a mechanism to amalgamate all the forces of nature. >>> It can be validated experimentally. >>> It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). >>> It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG) >>> It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity as subsets. >>> It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. >>> It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. >>> It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. >>> It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum experiments. >>> It explains the structures of atoms. >>> >> >> And you haven’t done one damn calculation with it. You don’t know how. >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The false premises of current physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 15:28 -0700
Re: The false premises of current physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 22:53 +0000
Re: The false premises of current physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 08:40 -0700
Re: The false premises of current physics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-11 10:48 -0500
Re: The false premises of current physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 05:35 -0700
Re: The false premises of current physics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-12 08:55 -0500
Re: The false premises of current physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000
Re: The false premises of current physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 05:32 -0700
Re: The false premises of current physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 13:09 +0000
Re: The false premises of current physics poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-11 09:09 -0700
Re: The false premises of current physics poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-11 09:21 -0700
Re: The false premises of current physics "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 09:28 -0700
Re: The false premises of current physics "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-09-11 10:18 -0700
csiph-web