Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #702240

Re: The false premises of current physics

Show all headers | View raw

kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>> The false premises of the current theories that led generations of
>>> physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase. Specifically, these false
>>> premises failed to lead physicists to come up with a unified theory for all the forces 
>>> 
>>> A summary of the false premises of current theories: 
>>> In quantum mechanics, specifically the QFT, a material object will
>>> project a field throughout space 
>> 
>> That is an incorrect description. 
> 
> This is false statemeant from an an uninformed woodworker.

No really. The correct description of QFT is what’s in books about QFT, not
what comes out of Ken Seto’s head about QFT. 

>> 
>>> and virtual particles in the form of bosons will pop in and out of this
>>> field. These bosons will act as force messengers to affect an appropriate
>>> force to the interacting object. The force messengers for all the forces
>>> can be summarized as follows: 
>>> The strong force messengers are the gluons. The existence of gluon has
>>> not been found experimentally. 
>> 
>> Incorrect, evidence has been found experimentally. 
> 
> No gluons has been found.

That’s incorrect. ISR. 

>> 
>>> 
>>> The force messengers for the electroweak force are: W+, W- and Z0. These
>>> force messengers have been found experimentally. 
>> 
>> That’s correct. 
>> 
>>> 
>>> The force messengers for the electromagnetic force are the photons. The
>>> virtual photons have been found experimentally. 
>> 
>> That’s correct. 
>> 
>>> 
>>> The force messengers for gravity are the gravitons. Graviton has not been
>>> found experimentally. 
>> 
>> That’s correct. 
>> 
>> So summarizing, the force carrier bosons for three of four basic
>> interactions have been found experimentally, and moreover those have the
>> exact features predicted by the theory. And on the basis of this remarkable
>> progress since the 1950s, barely six decades, you are declaring quantum
>> field theory a dismal failure with false premises? How can a theory with
>> false premises be so spectacularly confirmed by experiment? Is your idea
>> that if a theory doesn’t have all its components and predictions confirmed
>> by experiment in five years then it’s a failure?
>> 
>>> In fact, the notion of gravitons for the force of gravity has been a
>>> total failure mathematically. This means that there is no valid theory
>>> of quantum gravity. 
>>> 
>>> Einstein’s premise of gravity is simply that the interacting objects
>>> follow the curvature of space-time. There is no physical cause of gravity
>>> in Einstein’s description. 
>> 
>> Incorrect. 
>> 
>>> In other words, GRT is merely a mathematical description of the paths
>>> followed by the interacting objects. 
>>> 
>>> I came to the conclusion that there is one physical model of our universe
>>> that can replace these divergent false premises of GRT and QFT. The
>>> result of an intense search for such physical model for the past twenty
>>> years is: Model Mechanics. Model Mechanics posits that all the particles,
>>> all the forces and all the processes of nature are the result of
>>> different absolute motions of the fundamental S-Particles in a structured
>>> and elastic ether called the E-Matrix. The detailed description of Model
>>> Mechanics is available in Chapter 3 of my book in the following link: 
>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2016ibook.pdf 
>>> 
>>> The main feature of Model Mechanics are as follows: 
>>> It offers a realistic origin of the universe. 
>>> It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. 
>>> It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. 
>>> It provides a mechanism to amalgamate all the forces of nature. 
>>> It can be validated experimentally. 
>>> It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). 
>>> It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG) 
>>> It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity as subsets. 
>>> It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. 
>>> It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. 
>>> It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. 
>>> It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum experiments. 
>>> It explains the structures of atoms.
>>> 
>> 
>> And you haven’t done one damn calculation with it. You don’t know how. 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The false premises of current physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 15:28 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 22:53 +0000
    Re: The false premises of current physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 08:40 -0700
      Re: The false premises of current physics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-11 10:48 -0500
        Re: The false premises of current physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 05:35 -0700
          Re: The false premises of current physics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-12 08:55 -0500
      Re: The false premises of current physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000
    Re: The false premises of current physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 05:32 -0700
      Re: The false premises of current physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 13:09 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current physics poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-11 09:09 -0700
    Re: The false premises of current physics poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-11 09:21 -0700
      Re: The false premises of current physics "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 09:28 -0700
        Re: The false premises of current physics "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-09-11 10:18 -0700

csiph-web