Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #701088
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! |
| Date | 2018-09-04 11:35 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pmmc8j$11q8$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <pmjj5h$deq$1@gioia.aioe.org> <a5d69826-8e8d-4e4e-bb94-e364f3c353c4@googlegroups.com> <pmjql6$ruu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <af1e0fba-39d7-4c8f-b926-d42a3a066612@googlegroups.com> <pmma6n$tue$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 9/4/2018 11:00 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Monday, September 3, 2018 at 8:22:51 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Monday, September 3, 2018 at 6:15:03 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, September 2, 2018 at 4:19:26 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> can we have energy without mass ??!!
>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>> E=m c^2
>>>>>>>> right ??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be careful. That is not saying that energy has mass or that mass is energy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===============================you ask me to be careful with mass in energy ?
>>>>>> ("-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> may be we have to get new eyes !!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a blind one can see there
>>>>>> energy that is done by
>>>>>> mass s well
>>>>>> movement
>>>>>> only an over supper smarty don t see it
>>>>>
>>>>> Which has nothing to do with E=mc^2.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that is the problem with you smarties
>>>>>> you make big efforts to be *over smart*
>>>>>> unlike me that i make my best
>>>>>> to be as simple as can be
>>>>>
>>>>> Simple is no cure for being incorrectly informed.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i think basic nature as well does it
>>>>>> basic nature does not know
>>>>>> your over smarty mathematics
>>>>>> and supper sophistications
>>>>>
>>>>> Basic nature does what it does, and it s our job to understand what it
>>>>> does. Nature doesn t give a damn what our common sense says, and nature has
>>>>> shown over and over again that our common sense is inadequate for
>>>>> understanding it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Besides, the mathematics is not that difficult for those young enough and
>>>>> interested enough to learn them. Nor are the ideas of quantum mechanics and
>>>>> fields all that difficult to grasp.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> =======================================nasty shameless crook
>>>> do you think i am one of your miserable students ??
>>>> =E = M C^2
>>>> GOT IT SHAMELESS CROOK
>>>>
>>>> DO YOU SEE THAT M THERE ?!!!!!!
>>>> do you think that with your mumble jummle
>>>> =i will say it in words
>>>>
>>>> ENERGY ENERGY !!- IS EQUAL TO MASS !! TIMES C^2
>>>
>>> It is the energy available from the conversion of rest mass. It is the
>>> numerical equality between two different kinds of physical quantities.
>>
>> ========================================
>> only numerical !???
>> it is numeric ** times most basic Dimensions **
>
> Yes only numerical.
>
> Notice that PV/nR has the same basic dimensions as temperature. But none of
> those quantities is a temperature.
E = M C^2
E = energy (measured in joules, J)
m = mass (measured in kilograms, kg)
c = the speed of light (measured in meters per second, ms -1 ),
Joules = mass*meter^2/sec^2 (SI units)
which is what a Joule is defined as.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule
>
> What I just demonstrated with the ideal gas law is also exactly true for
> E=mc^2. The dimensions of left and right side are the same, but they are
> different physical quantities.
>
>> =
>> you know Bodkin
>> half of the truth is a lie !!
>> don t you know that ?after so many years
>> i wonder what happened to you
>> may be it is you who are getting older ??
>> LIKE SAY
>> 'the binding ***energy** ..of a proton and neutron
>> is say 0.00123. A M U ...
>> A M U is in mass
>> Atomic mass units A M U
>> Bodkin
>> you find the wrong man to argue with
>> TIA
>> Y.P
>> =====================
>> === ..
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-01 20:41 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-01 20:50 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-01 21:54 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-02 00:29 -0700
CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 04:36 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 13:19 +0000
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 06:38 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 12:22 -0400
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-02 11:42 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-03 06:02 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 15:14 +0000
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-03 10:15 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 17:22 +0000
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-04 05:30 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 16:00 +0000
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-04 11:35 -0500
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-04 10:17 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-04 10:23 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 18:02 +0000
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-04 11:56 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 19:30 +0000
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! Henrietta Foreskineater <invalid@example.com> - 2018-09-02 07:18 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 12:19 -0400
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 13:45 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-03 01:49 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 13:46 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-09-02 14:23 -0700
Re: CAN WE HAVE ENERGY- WITHOUT MASS ??!! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-02 14:29 -0700
csiph-web