Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup?

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup?
Date	2018-08-29 21:14 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pm7juo$1lfv$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <pm6ij9$t2r$1@dont-email.me> <pm6nkg$bjl$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pm7297$5m1$1@dont-email.me> <pm7h2h$1hrb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <33961c4a-1027-4ba2-ba54-975f09c6b2fe@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/29/2018 8:46 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 6:25:42 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> On 8/29/2018 4:13 PM, Libor Striz wrote:
>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> Wrote in message:
>>>
>>>>> And that is true, in contrary to mathematics. 
>>>>
>>>>     Math is also founded upon assumptions, axoums, .
>>>
>>> Yes, but built over set  of axioms,
>>> it's  theorems can be proven true or false. That is not case of
>>>  scientific theories and  their parts.
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> theory is modified, or accepted as working in regions
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure, but if it needs modification, it is not right.
>>> If  it needs to be limited to a region, like GT or SR, it is not
>>>  right either out of region.
>>> It neither means it is right within the region. It may just mean
>>>  the error is  acceptable or statistically insignificant.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> yes, like a math model. I have a set of Dover book on Physics, a 2
>> volumes, and each chapter covers a branch of physics, they are composed
>> of math models, and the equations "work" for that 'region' of the
>> problem.  most chapters are completly different equations which describe
>> what is going on, within error bounds, and with assumptions, etc
>>
>> take the math model of the flight of a bullet, simple at first, then add
>> air resistance, add temperature and density, add wind, add spin, add 3rd
>> dimention, add shape of bullet, add in material of bullet, add density
>> striation, add non uniform accelleration in gun barrel, add in
>> transition from gun barrel etc. refining the model to make it more
>> accurate. (in WW2 they used analog computers made of gears and turning
>> rods to calculate this stuff)
>>
>> so there is no black or white, truth or lies in physics, unless some
>> researcher makes stuff up, but that could be unintentional, like cold
>> fusion.
> 
> Eternal quantities are better. Unity as a concept... oneness in religion
> and unification in science... or most superior- Into Togetherness
> 

     like a jar of gummy bears in the sun,

the 'All Stuck Together Theory' (ASTT)

Thread

Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-29 07:10 -0700
  Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-29 09:32 -0500
    Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:52 +0200
  Re:Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:46 +0200
    Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-29 08:10 -0700
      Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:20 +0000
      Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-08-29 18:45 +0200
        Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-29 13:11 -0500
          Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-08-29 23:13 +0200
            Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-29 20:25 -0500
              Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-29 18:46 -0700
                Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-29 21:14 -0500
          Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 00:04 -0700
    Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 23:57 -0700
      Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-08-30 15:23 +0200
        Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 16:40 -0700
  No one is welcome here. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-29 08:26 -0700
  Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:10 +0000
    Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-30 03:34 -0700
      Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-08-30 08:43 -0400
        Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-30 13:00 -0500

csiph-web