Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #700424
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? |
| Date | 2018-08-29 20:25 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pm7h2h$1hrb$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <pm6bje$d87$1@dont-email.me> <dafdd450-159f-4dc6-ab2e-2f678b192e26@googlegroups.com> <pm6ij9$t2r$1@dont-email.me> <pm6nkg$bjl$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pm7297$5m1$1@dont-email.me> |
On 8/29/2018 4:13 PM, Libor Striz wrote: > Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> Wrote in message: > >>> And that is true, in contrary to mathematics. >> >> Math is also founded upon assumptions, axoums, . > > Yes, but built over set of axioms, > it's theorems can be proven true or false. That is not case of > scientific theories and their parts. >> > >> >> theory is modified, or accepted as working in regions >> > > Sure, but if it needs modification, it is not right. > If it needs to be limited to a region, like GT or SR, it is not > right either out of region. > It neither means it is right within the region. It may just mean > the error is acceptable or statistically insignificant. > > yes, like a math model. I have a set of Dover book on Physics, a 2 volumes, and each chapter covers a branch of physics, they are composed of math models, and the equations "work" for that 'region' of the problem. most chapters are completly different equations which describe what is going on, within error bounds, and with assumptions, etc take the math model of the flight of a bullet, simple at first, then add air resistance, add temperature and density, add wind, add spin, add 3rd dimention, add shape of bullet, add in material of bullet, add density striation, add non uniform accelleration in gun barrel, add in transition from gun barrel etc. refining the model to make it more accurate. (in WW2 they used analog computers made of gears and turning rods to calculate this stuff) so there is no black or white, truth or lies in physics, unless some researcher makes stuff up, but that could be unintentional, like cold fusion.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-29 07:10 -0700
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-29 09:32 -0500
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:52 +0200
Re:Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:46 +0200
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-29 08:10 -0700
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:20 +0000
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-08-29 18:45 +0200
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-29 13:11 -0500
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-08-29 23:13 +0200
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-29 20:25 -0500
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-29 18:46 -0700
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-29 21:14 -0500
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 00:04 -0700
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 23:57 -0700
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-08-30 15:23 +0200
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 16:40 -0700
No one is welcome here. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-08-29 08:26 -0700
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:10 +0000
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-30 03:34 -0700
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-08-30 08:43 -0400
Re: Are non-physicists not welcome in this newsgroup? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-30 13:00 -0500
csiph-web