Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #697333
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: We don't know what we don't know |
| Date | 2018-08-06 16:57 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pkag7d$op5$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <pk9k7t$177g$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b0e80e0d-ab20-43a6-95fd-9aeb470a006f@googlegroups.com> <pk9pac$1got$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0baf7bfb-df8a-4fec-a44d-4c28a0258597@googlegroups.com> <pkafh0$4un$1@dont-email.me> |
On 8/6/2018 4:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 8/6/2018 9:29 AM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote: >> On Monday, August 6, 2018 at 8:56:08 PM UTC+5:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> <alal65536@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Monday, August 6, 2018 at 7:29:30 PM UTC+5:30, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 8/6/2018 6:44 AM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> My quest for truth is to understand myself and the world better. >>>>>> Scientists search for simple laws that describe the natural world. >>>>>> With classical physics, scientist felt they had discovered almost >>>>>> everything and the process was ending. Then came relativity and >>>>>> quantum mechanics. The end is but the beginning. >>>>>> >>>>>> The famous quote about unknown unknowns is from Donald Rumsfeld, a US >>>>>> Congressman. But does it also apply to physics? >>>>>> >>>>>> Mathematics hates contradictions. >>>>> >>>>> no so, they are very useful. >>>>> >>>>>> And physics can be said to be empirical with theory of applied >>>>>> mathematics. But even in physics there is contradiction. Wave >>>>>> particle duality is considered by some to be a contradiction. >>>>>> >>>>>> According to arxiv.org, in "Types of paradoxes in physics", >>>>>> 'axioms of >>>>>> a formal system allow for the possibility of contradiction'. And >>>>>> physics is somewhat a formal system. >>>>> >>>>> not sure what you mean by "formal system", as physics is disparate >>>>> collection. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We will never discover everything, I suspect. But we can continue to >>>>>> have a better understanding of ourselves and the world. >>>>>> Understanding >>>>>> ourselves is just as important as understanding the rest of the >>>>>> world. >>>>>> Biology is just as important as physics. But what are the limits >>>>>> to our understanding? >>>>>> >>>>>> I only read that one paper on arxiv.org, but I need to understand >>>>>> more >>>>>> about how much a thing (human, in this case) can understand >>>>>> itself, and >>>>>> how biased our physics is because it was discovered/created by >>>>>> humans. >>>>> >>>>> physics is not biased. >>>> >>>> Is the human mind, connected to the human senses like vision and >>>> hearing, >>>> specific to humans and other earth species. Might aliens in other >>>> world >>>> have different kind of minds and sense organs, perceiving the world >>>> differently. So is our physics biased based on our specific type of >>>> mind and body? >>>> >>>> Abhinav Lal >>> >>> I think you should first of all be clear that most of the work that >>> is done >>> in physics today does not involve sensory data collection. Most >>> experimental observation now involves the design of instruments and >>> detectors that are sensitive to phenomena wholly outside our sensory >>> domain, and the output of those instruments and detectors is almost >>> entirely processed and analyzed using digital algorithms on computers. >> >> I am somewhat aware of this. If aliens have different kind of senses, >> instead of detecting photons with their eyes, they might detect some >> other particles with whatever sense organs they have, then they will >> create instruments to detect those particles, which may not be known >> to us. > > I always wondered if aliens had compound eyes that can naturally zoom in > and see the microscopic world without any external instruments. So, the > devices that they do build must be on a radically different level than > anything on Earth. there is a new camera with multiple lenses of different sizes, a computer combines the images in different ways to get zoom or close up or... https://www.wired.com/2015/10/light-l16-camera/ > > > > >> Also, different natural phenomenon might occur in their environment, >> leading them to discover/create new physics to explain it. They might >> discover new kind of forces or particles. >> >> I think that alien physics won't be exactly the same as our physics. >> >> What if the physical constants are different where they are in the >> universe. Or if there is a multiverse, might they not have a >> different kind of physics in a different universe. >> >> Abhinav Lal >> Writer & Investor >> >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me close this discussion with some quotes. >>>>>> >>>>>> "The more I know, the less I know" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> the huge # of problems are not solvable with math, anything over 5 >>>>> dimensions or 5 degrees of freedom typically. >>>>> >>>>> a complex move by a hand on a robot, must be taught to it, as the >>>>> optimum path is not solvable by math. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Abhinav Lal >>>>>> Writer & Investor >>>>>> >>>>>> "I am a contradiction, >>>>>> There is no logical solution" >>>>> >>>>> too general. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >> >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 04:44 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 12:11 +0000
Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 05:55 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 07:34 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 10:21 -0500
Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:21 -0400
Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:21 +0000
Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:05 -0400
The uncaused cause. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-08-12 17:11 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:03 -0400
Re: We don't know what we don't know john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 07:17 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 11:22 -0400
Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 08:59 -0500
Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 07:42 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 10:20 -0500
Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:26 +0000
Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 09:29 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 16:43 +0000
Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:23 -0400
Re: We don't know what we don't know "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-06 14:45 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 16:57 -0500
Re: We don't know what we don't know "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-08 23:39 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 17:10 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:08 -0400
Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 15:07 -0500
Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 17:27 -0400
Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 16:35 -0500
Re: We don't know what we don't know poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-08-13 15:59 -0700
Re: We don't know what we don't know Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 16:59 -0700
We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-08-12 16:53 -0700
Re: We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-12 22:59 -0500
Re: We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 11:42 -0400
Re: We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-08-13 13:42 -0700
csiph-web