Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #697213

Re: We don't know what we don't know

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: We don't know what we don't know
Date 2018-08-06 12:11 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <pk9dtt$ru2$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <c75c3dd1-1967-4f70-aeee-7ca92b4495fc@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


<alal65536@gmail.com> wrote:
> My quest for truth is to understand myself and the world better. 
> Scientists search for simple laws that describe the natural world.  With
> classical physics, scientist felt they had discovered almost everything
> and the process was ending.  Then came relativity and quantum mechanics. 
> The end is but the beginning.
> 
> The famous quote about unknown unknowns is from Donald Rumsfeld, a US
> Congressman.  But does it also apply to physics?
> 
> Mathematics hates contradictions.  And physics can be said to be
> empirical with theory of applied mathematics.  But even in physics there
> is contradiction.  

I disagree. 

> Wave particle duality is considered by some to be a contradiction.

Not among the knowledgeable. 

> 
> According to arxiv.org, in "Types of paradoxes in physics", 'axioms of a
> formal system allow for the possibility of contradiction'.  And physics
> is somewhat a formal system.
> 
> We will never discover everything, I suspect.  But we can continue to
> have a better understanding of ourselves and the world.  Understanding
> ourselves is just as important as understanding the rest of the world. 
> Biology is just as important as physics.  But what are the limits to our understanding?
> 
> I only read that one paper on arxiv.org, but I need to understand more
> about how much a thing (human, in this case) can understand itself, and
> how biased our physics is because it was discovered/created by humans.

The purpose of physics is to understand nature, not so much us. That’s a
different set of fields. 

> 
> Let me close this discussion with some quotes.
> 
> "The more I know, the less I know"
> 
> Abhinav Lal 
> Writer & Investor
> 
> "I am a contradiction,
> There is no logical solution"
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 04:44 -0700
  Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 12:11 +0000
    Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 05:55 -0700
    Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 07:34 -0700
      Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 10:21 -0500
        Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:21 -0400
      Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:21 +0000
        Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:05 -0400
      The uncaused cause. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-12 17:11 -0700
    Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:03 -0400
    Re: We don't know what we don't know john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 07:17 -0700
      Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 11:22 -0400
  Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 08:59 -0500
    Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 07:42 -0700
      Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 10:20 -0500
      Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:26 +0000
        Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 09:29 -0700
          Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 16:43 +0000
            Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:23 -0400
          Re: We don't know what we don't know "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-06 14:45 -0700
            Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 16:57 -0500
              Re: We don't know what we don't know "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-08 23:39 -0700
          Re: We don't know what we don't know Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 17:10 -0700
        Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:08 -0400
        Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 15:07 -0500
          Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 17:27 -0400
            Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 16:35 -0500
    Re: We don't know what we don't know poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-08-13 15:59 -0700
  Re: We don't know what we don't know Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 16:59 -0700
  We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-12 16:53 -0700
    Re: We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-12 22:59 -0500
      Re: We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 11:42 -0400
    Re: We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-08-13 13:42 -0700

csiph-web