Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #27920
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro |
| Date | 2018-08-02 23:12 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <pjvs32$9uu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <pjum5h$bs4$1@dont-email.me> <dkt5md5p1f7041qaush15drpe9k36ajke1@4ax.com> <pjv5ah$d7a$1@dont-email.me> <a9d6mdhea5csaqnmsdbmsn4jfuj7kdg4aq@4ax.com> <j_G8D.1977041$B36.32253@fx22.am4> |
On 02/08/18 19:14, Tom Gardner wrote: > On 02/08/18 17:56, upsidedown@downunder.com wrote: >> All you need is the ability to have stacks in RAM and in addition >> instructions for loading and storing the stack pointer from/to memory. > > Unfortunately that is difficult to implement in C, so youngsters > don't think of it. > This particular youngster grew up on small microcontrollers programmed in assembly. "All you need is the RAM" is not helpful when you have 512 bytes in total, and the stack pointer is limited to accessing the first 128 bytes of that. I have worked on microcontrollers where the context switches involved in handling an interrupt could easily take 50 µs or more - a proper RTOS would be far too high overhead. Of course you can have more minimal OS's with very limited features (all the way down to "protothreads"), and perhaps cooperative multi-tasking rather than pre-emptive. But then you are not going to have threads with multiple message queues like the ones under discussion.
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro "gp.kiwi@gmail.com" <graeme.prentice@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 04:01 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-07-20 20:19 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro graeme.prentice@gmail.com - 2018-07-20 15:54 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 18:27 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro graeme.prentice@gmail.com - 2018-07-20 23:58 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-07-21 14:32 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro mac <acolvin@efunct.com> - 2018-07-26 19:37 +0000
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2018-07-21 21:48 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2018-07-23 09:58 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-07-22 13:15 -0500
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 08:51 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro "gp.kiwi@gmail.com" <graeme.prentice@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 14:53 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 15:23 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 09:08 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-07-31 09:21 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-07-31 09:13 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 15:16 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-01 07:53 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 15:49 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-08-01 21:47 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:11 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-01 20:23 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 12:24 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-08-02 16:14 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 16:43 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:12 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 18:13 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 23:05 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 14:22 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2018-08-03 10:14 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-03 10:22 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 23:48 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-08-02 19:56 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 18:14 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 23:12 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 23:52 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-03 10:28 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-03 11:21 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-03 13:51 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-08-03 09:11 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-08-04 03:00 -0400
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-02 12:23 -0500
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 23:13 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-08-04 03:08 -0400
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-02 12:23 -0500
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-08-02 14:15 -0400
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 19:21 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 23:18 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-03 00:02 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:28 -0700
csiph-web