Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #27928
| From | Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro |
| Date | 2018-08-03 10:14 +0300 |
| Organization | Tidorum Ltd |
| Message-ID | <fsidmuFdg5kU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <dkt5md5p1f7041qaush15drpe9k36ajke1@4ax.com> <pjv5ah$d7a$1@dont-email.me> <94fdd2e8-e1a4-48ff-9ffb-10fc21640439@googlegroups.com> <pjvrnl$7ge$1@dont-email.me> <ac23d398-ba9f-477a-a292-b98ff5c4b22c@googlegroups.com> |
On 18-08-03 00:22 , StateMachineCOM wrote:
> @David Brown: As they say: "you can lead a horse to water, but you
> can't make it drink". I rest my case.
At least this one juror decides in favour of David B.
All programs are state machines, but the "state" can be represented in
various ways: as data ("reified") or as control flow ("sequential",
"blocking"). Which is better depends on the problem to be solved;
usually I end up with a mixture.
Sometimes system constraints force one to use more data-state than is
optimal, and the code becomes an awful mess. I have in mind my last
project but one, where the SW controls several devices over a
MIL-STD-1553 bus, with a cyclic, frame-based schedule, running several
sporadically activated concurrent activites, each of which usually
requires several carefully timed bus commands and responses, spread over
several bus cycles.
The nicest design would dedicate one thread to each such activity; after
sending a command, the thread would wait (block) for the response, and
would know, from its position in the algorithm, what to do with the
response and what command to send next. But system constraints prohibit
this number of threads, and thread switches, so all the state of the
activities is reified into multiple state machines, activated once on
every bus cycle, with switch/case statements that change the global
state, increment counters, detect end of loops, retry failed commands,
and so on and on. Yuck.
--
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
. @ .
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro "gp.kiwi@gmail.com" <graeme.prentice@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 04:01 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-07-20 20:19 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro graeme.prentice@gmail.com - 2018-07-20 15:54 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 18:27 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro graeme.prentice@gmail.com - 2018-07-20 23:58 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-07-21 14:32 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro mac <acolvin@efunct.com> - 2018-07-26 19:37 +0000
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2018-07-21 21:48 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2018-07-23 09:58 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-07-22 13:15 -0500
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 08:51 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro "gp.kiwi@gmail.com" <graeme.prentice@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 14:53 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 15:23 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 09:08 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-07-31 09:21 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-07-31 09:13 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 15:16 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-01 07:53 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 15:49 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-08-01 21:47 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:11 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-01 20:23 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 12:24 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-08-02 16:14 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 16:43 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:12 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 18:13 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 23:05 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 14:22 -0700
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2018-08-03 10:14 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-03 10:22 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 23:48 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-08-02 19:56 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 18:14 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 23:12 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 23:52 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-03 10:28 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-03 11:21 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-03 13:51 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-08-03 09:11 +0300
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-08-04 03:00 -0400
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-02 12:23 -0500
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 23:13 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-08-04 03:08 -0400
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-02 12:23 -0500
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-08-02 14:15 -0400
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 19:21 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-08-02 23:18 +0200
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-08-03 00:02 +0100
Re: C++ threads versus PThreads for embedded Linux on ARM micro StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:28 -0700
csiph-web