Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #495545
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: Deep Thought |
| Date | 2018-07-26 19:45 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pjdme6$14b5$3@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <pj8e4h$i8c$1@dont-email.me> <frs519Fc63sU1@mid.individual.net> <5B596BF0.3E6F@ix.netcom.com> <pjck6e$1abs$2@gioia.aioe.org> <5B5A118D.955@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 7/26/2018 2:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > benj wrote: >> >> On 7/26/2018 2:36 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> >>>> Am 25.07.2018 um 01:52 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: >>>> >>>>>>> <sci-fi> >>>>>>> I have always had a little feeling that the big bang might be nothing >>>>>>> more than a local hyper massive explosion contained within a much >>>>>>> larger universe. Perhaps a cluster of ultra massive black holes all >>>>>>> finally merged together. Wrt a larger universe, the big bang could be >>>>>>> a single pixel in the following rendering: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.fractalforums.com/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=17379 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.fractalforums.com/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=17386 >>>>>>> (a zoom...) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> </sci-fi> >>>>>> >>>>>> Nice pictures! >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. :^) >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think, the universe is actually a very large fractal and our little >>>>>> world is nothing but a 'chapter' in a much larger story. >>>>> >>>>> Think of a fractal where branching points are the result of a shi% load >>>>> of hyper massive black holes finally merging together into a single, >>>>> crazy massive black hole. Well, think if each branch in the following >>>>> online 2d vector field simulation of mine was a universe, contained >>>>> within a black hole centered at the point of bifurcation: >>>>> >>>>> http://funwithfractals.atspace.cc/ct_fdla_anime_dynamic_test/ >>>>> >>>>> Now, if this works for you, one can click on a point to dynamically >>>>> create a new attracting point. Let it run for a couple of minutes, then >>>>> click a couple of points within the parametric square. >>>>> >>>>> Fwiw, I am working on an interactive OpenGL 3d version. >>>> >>>> Fractals require complex numbers (in '4D') and the universe could >>>> possibly be based on something similar to quaternions or bi-quaternions >>>> (complex four vectors). >>>> >>>> I'm actually following this idea and it looks quite promising. >>>> >>>> (btw - you may have look at my 'book' here: >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 ) >>>> >>>>>> To understand the idea of big bang, you need to think about the >>>>>> underlying axioms of big-bang theory (which are - of course - wrong). >>>>>> >>>>>> Big-bang is based on a single universal time-line, that starts at the >>>>>> event called big-bang and ends (for instance) here.# >>>>>> >>>>>> This cannot possibly be true. One reason: the universe does not look >>>>>> like an expanding two-dimensional sphere. >>>>>> >>>>>> Better solution: there are multiple timelines possible and to any such >>>>>> 'axis of time' belongs a different 'time domaine' which has its own >>>>>> space. >>>>>> >>>>>> Such a space could pop out of nowhere and subsequently build a new >>>>>> 'universe'. But that 'universe' is just a local impression and not >>>>>> universal at all. >>>>> >>>>> Imvvvvho, it did not pop out of "nowhere". I just have a strange feeling >>>>> that it was, perhaps never created at all! It was always there, will >>>>> continue to be, and will never pass away. Humm... Not sure at all! I >>>>> just have a little feeling. >>>> >>>> https://www.amazon.de/Zero-Infinity-Foundations-Physics-Everything/dp/9812709142 >>>> >>>> The theory of Prof. Peter Rowlands was, that nothing could actually >>>> split into opposite directions. The one side could add to the other to >>>> nothing again, if these sides would ever combine to again (what >>>> apparently does not happen). >>>> >>>> That would be a creation out of nothing. >>>> >>>> TH >>> >>> nothing doesn't exist..there will always be something where there is nothing. >>> >>> >>> In other words...you cannot "creation out of nothing" since 'creation' means..."bring *something* into existence". >>> >>> >>> So, something comes from nothing...(using your own words 'creation') >>> >> That is a really deep scientific thought, faker. > > > > There is nothing scientific about nothing since physics is about the properties of...something. > By your own "logic" nothing is something and thus a proper study of science.
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Deep Thought The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-22 14:26 -0700
Re: Deep Thought Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-07-23 16:43 +0200
Re: Deep Thought Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-23 18:08 +0200
Re: Deep Thought "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-23 21:45 -0700
Re: Deep Thought Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-07-24 11:42 +0200
Re: Deep Thought The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-24 11:21 -0700
Re: Deep Thought "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-24 16:52 -0700
Re: Deep Thought Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-07-25 22:31 +0200
Re: Deep Thought The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-25 23:36 -0700
Re: Deep Thought benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 10:00 -0400
Re: Deep Thought The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-26 11:23 -0700
Re: Deep Thought benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 19:45 -0400
Re: Deep Thought "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-25 23:56 -0700
Re: Deep Thought "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-26 00:00 -0700
Re: Deep Thought Daniel60 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2018-07-27 17:01 +1000
Re: Deep Thought The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-27 10:38 -0700
Re: Deep Thought The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-28 10:38 -0700
Re: Deep Thought "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-27 14:29 -0700
Re: Deep Thought Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-07-28 12:00 +0200
Re: Deep Thought Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-28 14:44 +0200
Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-08-12 15:59 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-12 16:15 -0700
Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-08-12 16:30 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-13 21:20 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-13 23:42 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-14 00:36 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-28 00:21 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-28 00:56 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. Daniel60 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2018-08-28 19:23 +1000
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-29 00:01 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-28 23:58 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-29 11:09 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-29 20:24 +0200
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-29 13:39 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-30 03:43 +0200
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-29 20:43 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-31 00:52 +0200
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-31 09:48 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-31 22:46 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-01 13:50 +0200
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-09-01 09:37 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-29 18:09 -0700
Re: Entropy converts black holes into SpaceTime. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-30 04:36 +0200
Re: Deep Thought Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-24 21:19 +0200
Re: Deep Thought The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-24 13:04 -0700
Re: Deep Thought Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-25 03:36 +0200
Re: Deep Thought The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-24 22:44 -0700
Re: Deep Thought benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:05 -0400
Re: Deep Thought "C. Deifir" <cdf@dfr.net.inv> - 2018-07-23 21:18 +0100
csiph-web