Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #691738
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. |
| Date | 2018-06-24 15:22 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <pgocvp$o7u$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <928c970a-4670-410d-a65d-3d32f661e96a@googlegroups.com> <pgmmsq$i8v$1@pcls7.std.com> <c917551a-a99a-41b6-a1ed-d48d22b46148@googlegroups.com> <pgo5lr$54n$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e7aaffe3-f012-4417-8933-1bb7abde57ea@googlegroups.com> |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > This has been rotated counterclockwise to display better. I describe it >how I built it, so I don't get crossed up: >The circle starts in the YZ plane, rotating around the X axis. At the same >time, the circle itself is rotated around the Z axis at the same rate: IN PHASE, ONE-TO-ONE. [snip detailed description of the color, shape and aroma of a turd] That's nice. But once again, why pull crap from your ass and then go into excruciating detail describing it. Why???? Science will describe what is OBSERVED and go into detail what science actually saw. Science will also take other evidence of what is observed and come up with a hypothesis, as well as an experiment that will falsify the hypothesis.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 13:40 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-21 16:33 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-21 23:40 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-21 16:49 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 06:28 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-22 13:45 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-23 00:54 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 07:09 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-23 16:16 -0400
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 05:42 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-23 16:16 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-23 23:59 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 05:56 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 13:17 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 06:29 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 13:31 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 06:55 -0700
Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 15:22 +0000
Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 09:44 -0700
Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 17:11 +0000
Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 11:39 -0700
Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 21:46 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 23:21 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:52 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 14:07 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:54 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:58 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 14:07 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-24 08:49 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 15:12 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-22 17:27 -0500
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 22:48 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-22 20:44 -0400
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-23 01:25 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 22:54 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-22 20:42 -0400
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-23 19:56 -0500
csiph-web