Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #691737
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. |
| Date | 2018-06-24 15:12 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <pgocd8$o7u$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <pgiuih$epr$1@pcls7.std.com> <f73bf600-4b84-4a3b-bcca-af48adfcdfd3@googlegroups.com> <928c970a-4670-410d-a65d-3d32f661e96a@googlegroups.com> <pgmmsq$i8v$1@pcls7.std.com> <c917551a-a99a-41b6-a1ed-d48d22b46148@googlegroups.com> |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >“what is the purpose of pulling crap out of your ass and posting it ” >http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/PHOTON.GIF >I am simply saying what I have drawn and animated. >If you understand something, you can draw it, In other words, you pulled some shit from your ass, you "understood" your shit and you drew the shit. What is the purpose of doing so? The purpose of science is to learn how nature works so we can model nature and we can predict what nature will do in another situation. >There. >English words. A picture. >Different but the same every time. And what a wonderful little turd you have there. A nice shade of brown. Still no answer to this? >BTW no answer to this? >>>>Also, explain how polarized sunglasses work.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 13:40 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-21 16:33 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-21 23:40 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-21 16:49 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 06:28 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-22 13:45 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-23 00:54 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 07:09 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-23 16:16 -0400
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 05:42 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-23 16:16 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-23 23:59 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 05:56 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 13:17 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 06:29 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 13:31 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 06:55 -0700
Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 15:22 +0000
Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 09:44 -0700
Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 17:11 +0000
Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 11:39 -0700
Re: Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 21:46 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 23:21 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:52 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 14:07 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:54 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:58 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 14:07 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-24 08:49 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 15:12 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-22 17:27 -0500
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 22:48 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-22 20:44 -0400
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-23 01:25 +0000
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 22:54 -0700
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-22 20:42 -0400
Re: Light wave circularly polarized? No, it’s not. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-23 19:56 -0500
csiph-web