Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #460064

Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity?

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity?
Date	2018-06-02 13:09 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<peu4tg$ua9$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <b352590c-c628-4b98-83f8-982f2ce696d1@googlegroups.com> <pepn2n$1vjj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f9430e28-767c-4434-8671-303dac2bfc73@googlegroups.com> <pepsc5$9a6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <51e5e269-5bde-427f-94ac-16bd687c4923@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 6:18:50 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 4:48:27 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 3:51:23 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 1:47:58 PM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 10:49:22 AM UTC-4, kenseto wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 6:33:38 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> []
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> No I am saying that the EM attractive gravitational force causes the
>>>>>>>>>>> centripetal acceleration. That in combination with the repulsive effect
>>>>>>>>>>> force exists between the interacting objects causes the stable orbiting motion.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Newton’s second law says that any acceleration is due to a (net) force in
>>>>>>>>>> the direction of the acceleration and given by F=ma. 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> That doesn’t say that there is a centripetal or centrifugal force.
>>>>>>>>> It says that CP or CF accelerations are caused by one of the
>>>>>>>>> fundamental forces. Specifically the CP acceleration is caused
>>>>>>>>> by the attractive force of gravity and gravity is a combination
>>>>>>>>> of an attractive EM force in combination with the repulsive
>>>>>>>>> effect of the interacting objects are confined to follow
>>>>>>>>> the divergent structure of theE-matrix.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ken, you keep proclaiming this like repetition is truth,
>>>>>>>> but you have provided zero evidence. In fact you have provided
>>>>>>>> zero testable predictions. I asked you before, put your
>>>>>>>> equations to the test and make the calculations.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You never provide any calculations to what you said....in fact you
>>>>>>> admitted that you don’t do math. I have a theory based on the existence
>>>>>>> of absolute motion in a structured aether called the E-matrix. I proposed
>>>>>>> new experiments to detect absolute motion and did example calculations.
>>>>>>> in the following link:
>>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015experiment.pdf
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If you cannot even calculate the lunar orbit with your theory
>>>>>>>> then you haven’t even gotten past step ONE.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You do calculations with your theory then I will do my calculations.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ken the calculations of standard physics theories are splattered all over
>>>>>> the place, though they are not reproduced here because Usenet is not a
>>>>>> textbook. You haven’t managed to read anything where the standard
>>>>>> calculations have ALREADY been done, but other people have. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On the other hand, the ONLY calculations from your theory are the ones you
>>>>>> produce and you haven’t produced any. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So the statement still stands: calculations from standard physics are
>>>>>> ALREADY done, calculations from your theory are NOT done at all. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hey moron, I have a better understand physics than you. You claimed that
>>>>> centripetal acceleration is a force.
>>>> 
>>>> I did not. You cannot read. 
>>> 
>>> Yes you did
>> 
>> Quote me, you senile fart. 
> 
> Ken Seto:
>>>> No, it is the attractive force of gravity between the interacting objects 
>>>> causes the centripetal acceleration. 
>>> 
> 
> Bodkin:
>>> Is the attractive force of gravity toward the center? Yes it is. Then it is 
>>> a centripetal force. Because that’s what centripetal MEANS. 
> 
> Ken Seto: 
>> No there is an centripetal acceleration toward the center. that 
>> acceleration is caused by the attraction aspect of gravity. You are 
>> saying that gravity and CP force is the same. It is not....There is no CP force. 
> 
> Now will you admit that you are senile and full of shit????

See? You cannot read. Nothing quoted above says or implies that centripetal
acceleration is a force. 

> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Moreover it is STILL true that standard physics has already produced
>>>> calculations and you have not. 
>>>> 
>>>> Babblers die alone. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

(Thread has 933 articles, showing 500 — browse group in flat view)

csiph-web