Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #459398

Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity?

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity?
Date	2018-05-26 17:21 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pec52a$14q9$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(16 earlier) <f9cda84c-e48f-40a6-a358-0dcc0fcf4ee7@googlegroups.com> <pea0bu$1nv1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e015011c-9e14-4181-8452-d500a6ce0b42@googlegroups.com> <pebtfn$n8p$2@gioia.aioe.org> <527b07e5-1f66-4b7a-bb2f-fde15f383585@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>> On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 5:48:50 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 1:05:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 9:04:01 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5/25/18 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 2:37:05 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 12:31:53 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Moron, here’s the definition for a centrifuge:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> So what?? I was not talking about a centrifuge.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm talking about the so called "centrifugal force"; there is no such
>>>>>>>>>>> force, as its definitions specify.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto’s thinking is that if centrifugal force were not real, then
>>>>>>>>>> physicists would contact dictionary editors to remove the mention of
>>>>>>>>>> centrifugal force from the definition of centrifuge. And if physicists
>>>>>>>>>> failed to do this, then this is a deliberate attempt to confuse the public.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> No moron, you claimed that the centrifugal force does not exist. The
>>>>>>>>> designers of the centrifuge based their design on the existence of
>>>>>>>>> the centrifugal force.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> That is not a true statement. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Assertion is not a valid argument.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> To find out what the designers of 
>>>>>>>> centrifuges base the design on, one must read what they wrote about 
>>>>>>>> their design. You have not. You have just relied on your own guesses 
>>>>>>>> about what they used to design them.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Why don’t you do that instead of making assertions as your argument?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I HAVE. You have not. 
>>>>>> Case closed. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then why did you say (assert) that centrifugal force doesn’t exist?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> It is a fictitious force, not a real force. 
>>>> Designers of centrifuges know this and their descriptions of how they work
>>>> get this right and do not make centrifugal force the underlying mechanism.
>>>> Editors of common dictionaries do not get it right. You do not get it
>>>> right. 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Answer this: If centrifugal force doesn’t exist, what is the force they
>>> use to separate the U 235 from the rest of the U isotopes to make atomic
>>> bomb??? Also why do they called the machine they use to do the separation a centrifuge?
>>> 
>> 
>> Buoyancy. Oil floats on water in a jar because of buoyancy, which pushes
>> oil up.  If you put oil and water in a centrifuge, the oil will be pushed
>> toward the center for the same reason.
> 
> Hey fool, oil is already floating on top of water. 

And if the axis of the centrifuge tube is horizontal? 

>I asked you: what force that separate the U325 from the rest of the
> U-isotopes. No answer on that.

I answered. Buoyancy. Which is a centripetal force. 

> 
>> 
>> They call it a centrifuge because it is a centrifuge. If you want to know
>> what principle governs the design and operation of a centrifuge, consult
>> the documentation of the designers.  Not a dictionary. Not your own head. 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

csiph-web