Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #458571

Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity?

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity?
Date	2018-05-20 18:40 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pdsfev$13r3$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <pdqbkv$hdt$1@dont-email.me> <149d6e44-77e8-4a4a-b98a-3e6d9045e0d1@googlegroups.com> <pdru4u$6b8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pdruh1$6u3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4de9d3d6-95d9-4910-b14e-88081c838b88@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> On Sunday, May 20, 2018 at 9:51:33 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, May 19, 2018 at 7:23:13 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
>>>>> On 5/19/2018 7:13 PM, kenseto wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, May 19, 2018 at 6:54:09 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/19/2018 6:10 PM, kenseto wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, May 19, 2018 at 3:16:43 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Well, Ken, you’ve finally turned the corner into madness. You, the educated
>>>>>>>>> and certified chemical engineer, have come to the conclusion that education
>>>>>>>>> is worthless and that one should avoid reading and education in favor of
>>>>>>>>> thinking for yourself.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> No moron, I believe that the past concept for gravity is wrong.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In other words, you have come to the conclusion that education about
>>>>>>> gravity is worthless and that you should avoid reading and education
>>>>>>> about gravity...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No idiot....Newton’s explanation of gravity is wrong. He think that
>>>>>> gravity a composed of a single force...namely the CP force. He didn’t
>>>>>> realize that without the CF force no orbiting motion is feasible.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In other words, you have come to the conclusion that education about 
>>>>> gravity is worthless and that you should avoid reading and education 
>>>>> about gravity.
>>>> 
>>>> That’s your conclusion.....not mine.
>>>> 
>>>>> Because you have decided Newton was wrong.
>>>> 
>>>> Newton is not God so he can be wrong. He visualized that gravity is a
>>>> single force like the EM force. It is not. It is a composite force as I
>>>> described in the following link:
>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
>>> 
>>> Only a fool claims to have a new idea in physics while being uneducated in
>>> the basics. 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> That’s why I proposed a new concept for gravity
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ...in favor of thinking for yourself.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Meanwhile, a REAL scientist with a potential new concept for gravity
>>>>>>> would want to learn as much as possible about existing beliefs about
>>>>>>> gravity. He would want to learn whether the new concept conflicts with
>>>>>>> known facts/measurements of gravity, to see if the concept has been
>>>>>>> proposed before (and if so, what happened with it) and especially,
>>>>>>> whether a test can be devised that would produce different results from
>>>>>>> the existing model if the new concept was correct than if it was false.
>>>>> 
>>>>> No comment?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> From Wikipedia:
>> 
>> In Newtonian mechanics, the centrifugal force is an inertial force (also
>> called a "fictitious" or "pseudo" force) directed away from the axis of
>> rotation that appears to act on all objects when viewed in a rotating frame
>> of reference.
>> 
>> Note: fictitious force, no tangential component. 
> 
> Notice that it is an inertial force directed away from the axis of
> rotation......Hey moron all rational motion have tangential component.
> Gee you are so fucking stupid.

Motion is not a force. 
Look at Wikipedia since YOU cited it. Neither centripetal or centrifugal
has any tangential component. That’s what the words MEAN, toward the center
and away from the center. 

> 
>> 
>> If you want to know why your hand goes in a circle when you whirl a rock on
>> a string, then ask. Or read your book. Don’t guess. You get it wrong every
>> single time. 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

csiph-web