Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #458483

Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory
Date 2018-05-19 22:43 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <pdq99m$1q7e$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <62101b3b-2d36-4654-83ab-a4347a1933b5@googlegroups.com> <1d96e022-5c37-486e-91ec-945f6b23da1c@googlegroups.com> <pdq20b$1ehf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <92729b8d-22e5-41ee-87fc-cbbb06001f65@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


<alsor@interia.pl> wrote:
> W dniu sobota, 19 maja 2018 22:38:39 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
>> <alsor@interia.pl> wrote:
>>> W dniu piątek, 18 maja 2018 23:05:50 UTC+2 użytkownik Edward Prochak napisał:
>>>> Okay, this post is to move the discussion away from
>>>> the personal and political thread. And acknowledging
>>>> that all theories are wrong, but some are useful,
>>>> lets discuss the pros and cons of the big bang theory.
>>>> 
>>>> Who's first?
>>> 
>>> I'm the last: the BB is another stupid fallacy in the science history, not any theory.
>>> 
>> 
>> Well what evidence is there against it? See for example the correct
>> predictions of the CMBR, the correct prediction of the amount of
>> nonuniformity if that, the ratio of helium to hydrogen, and the Hubble
>> redshift vs distance proportionality. 
> 
> CBM radiation is just the radiation of stars measured in the space...

The thermal spectrum is wrong. Stars don’t have a temperature of 2.7K. 

The Big Bang model Nailed this as a prediction. I get that you want to
explain it some other way. But you’re  going to have to explain the values
of the numbers. The Big Bang does. Same with the ratio of He to H. 

> and the redshift is the same: energy of CMB = starlight energy, etc.
> 
>> It’s a bit of a stretch to call something a fallacy that gets so many
>> things right. 
> 
> Nonsense is not right nor wrong simultaneously.
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 14:05 -0700
  Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-18 14:30 -0700
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-18 21:46 +0000
  Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 21:50 +0000
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 14:55 -0700
      Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:00 -0700
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 14:57 -0400
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-19 12:54 -0700
  Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-19 12:43 -0700
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 20:38 +0000
      Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-19 15:35 -0700
        Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 22:43 +0000
          Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-19 15:57 -0700
            Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:32 +0000
              Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-20 13:05 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 21:16 +0000
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-20 14:58 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 22:22 +0000
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-20 15:46 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 01:23 +0000
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-21 09:00 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 16:53 +0000
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:35 -0500
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:51 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:37 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:36 -0700
            Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:31 -0700
        Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:07 -0700
          Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-21 13:44 -0700
            Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 08:51 -0700
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:05 -0700
  Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:57 -0700
  Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-21 14:02 -0700

csiph-web