Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #458606
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory |
| Date | 2018-05-20 21:16 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pdsoiv$1k9a$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <92729b8d-22e5-41ee-87fc-cbbb06001f65@googlegroups.com> <pdq99m$1q7e$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0e236833-ab5c-472d-b318-1745838b1867@googlegroups.com> <pdrtd9$55r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cf67ad4b-66ce-4601-b903-54fe597b4a6b@googlegroups.com> |
<alsor@interia.pl> wrote: > W dniu niedziela, 20 maja 2018 15:32:29 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał: >> <alsor@interia.pl> wrote: >>> W dniu niedziela, 20 maja 2018 00:43:06 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał: >>> >>>>> CBM radiation is just the radiation of stars measured in the space... >>>> >>>> The thermal spectrum is wrong. Stars don’t have a temperature of 2.7K. >>> >>> Spectrum is prefect for the black body in the perfect equilibrium state. >>> The temperature of the whole Universe is 2.7K, not of these stars alone! >>> >>>> The Big Bang model Nailed this as a prediction. I get that you want to >>>> explain it some other way. But you’re going to have to explain the values >>>> of the numbers. The Big Bang does. Same with the ratio of He to H. >>> >>> He/H = 1/4 thus the CMB radiation energy is perfectly consistent with this fact. >> >> I would greatly enjoy you showing that the CMBR spectrum implies a He/H >> ratio of 1/4 without using the Big Bang model. > > I showed this already... several days ago. > > The CMB energy quantity/density is perfectly equal > to these 25% of hydrogen fusion... > > The energy density is about: 1/600 ro*c^2; > where: ro = 3e-28 kg/m3 is matter density in the Universe. I’m not following. What does this energy density have to do with the ratio of He to H? > > So, there is no room for any Big-Bang fantasy. > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 14:05 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-18 14:30 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-18 21:46 +0000
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 21:50 +0000
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 14:55 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:00 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 14:57 -0400
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-19 12:54 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-19 12:43 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 20:38 +0000
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-19 15:35 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 22:43 +0000
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-19 15:57 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:32 +0000
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-20 13:05 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 21:16 +0000
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-20 14:58 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 22:22 +0000
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-20 15:46 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 01:23 +0000
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-21 09:00 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 16:53 +0000
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:35 -0500
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:51 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:37 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:36 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:31 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:07 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-21 13:44 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 08:51 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:05 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:57 -0700
Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-21 14:02 -0700
csiph-web