Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #458606

Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory
Date 2018-05-20 21:16 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <pdsoiv$1k9a$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <92729b8d-22e5-41ee-87fc-cbbb06001f65@googlegroups.com> <pdq99m$1q7e$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0e236833-ab5c-472d-b318-1745838b1867@googlegroups.com> <pdrtd9$55r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cf67ad4b-66ce-4601-b903-54fe597b4a6b@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


<alsor@interia.pl> wrote:
> W dniu niedziela, 20 maja 2018 15:32:29 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
>> <alsor@interia.pl> wrote:
>>> W dniu niedziela, 20 maja 2018 00:43:06 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
>>> 
>>>>> CBM radiation is just the radiation of stars measured in the space...
>>>> 
>>>> The thermal spectrum is wrong. Stars don’t have a temperature of 2.7K. 
>>> 
>>> Spectrum is prefect for the black body in the perfect equilibrium state.
>>> The temperature of the whole Universe is 2.7K, not of these stars alone!
>>> 
>>>> The Big Bang model Nailed this as a prediction. I get that you want to
>>>> explain it some other way. But you’re  going to have to explain the values
>>>> of the numbers. The Big Bang does. Same with the ratio of He to H. 
>>> 
>>> He/H = 1/4 thus the CMB radiation energy is perfectly consistent with this fact.
>> 
>> I would greatly enjoy you showing that the CMBR spectrum implies a He/H
>> ratio of 1/4 without using the Big Bang model. 
> 
> I showed this already... several days ago.
> 
> The CMB energy quantity/density is perfectly equal
> to these 25% of hydrogen fusion...
> 
> The energy density is about: 1/600 ro*c^2;
> where: ro = 3e-28 kg/m3 is matter density in the Universe.

I’m not following. What does this energy density have to do with the ratio
of He to H?

> 
> So, there is no room for any Big-Bang fantasy.
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 14:05 -0700
  Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-18 14:30 -0700
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-18 21:46 +0000
  Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 21:50 +0000
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 14:55 -0700
      Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:00 -0700
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 14:57 -0400
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-19 12:54 -0700
  Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-19 12:43 -0700
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 20:38 +0000
      Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-19 15:35 -0700
        Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 22:43 +0000
          Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-19 15:57 -0700
            Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:32 +0000
              Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-20 13:05 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 21:16 +0000
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-20 14:58 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 22:22 +0000
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-20 15:46 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 01:23 +0000
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-21 09:00 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 16:53 +0000
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:35 -0500
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:51 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:37 -0700
                Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:36 -0700
            Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:31 -0700
        Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:07 -0700
          Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-21 13:44 -0700
            Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 08:51 -0700
    Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:05 -0700
  Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:57 -0700
  Re: Merits and deficiencies of the Big Bang theory alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-21 14:02 -0700

csiph-web