Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.arch > #2428

Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture

Followups directed to: comp.arch

Show all headers | View raw

Robert Myers wrote:
>> For the stuff mentioned by Terje, it's not necessary to resort to
>> exotic interpretations.  Causality is maintained, because the two
>> events are so far apart that neither can have caused the other
>> (without faster-than-light messages).
> 
> But isn't that precisely (if anything about this subject is precise)
> what we don't understand about the EPR paradox and experiments that
> expose it?

IMHO what the classical interpretation about EPR paradox does not 
understand is the order of events. The Copenhagen interpretation is the 
following chain of events, and therefore causality: creation of 
entangled pair -> delay -> measurement -> collapse of wave function. My 
interpretation is that the real chain of events is: measurement setup -> 
delay -> collapse of wave function -> creation of entangled pair -> 
delay -> measurement. There is no dynamic component in the QM wave 
function in Bell's inequality, so you can reorder the chain of events as 
you like. If the measurement setup after the two delays is still the 
same (can have changed in between), your measurement is as expected by 
QM.

There have only two measurements been performed so far that can possible 
identify the chain of events, and the first one failed completely: 
Aspect et all set up an oscillating switch with 50MHz, at a distance of 
6m from the source. 6m*50MHz=300000km/s=c. Given that Aspect et all very 
likely optimized their setup for showing the best violation of Bell's 
inequality, it's a strong hint that my interpretation is closer to 
reality than Copenhagen, where the distance wouldn't have mattered at 
all.

The next dynamic measurement by a student of Anton Zeilinger used a 
random switch, and failed to deliver, because the student didn't get the 
visibility to more than 25%, despite using high-quality components for 
everything (where theoretically the visibility should be much closer to 
100% than to 25%). That could have all sorts of reasons, it doesn't rule 
out that this was a successful EPR experiment, but it's simply too low 
to violate Bell's inequality.

The third strong hint that there is a dynamic effect is the BCS theory 
for superconductivity: You have cooper pairs (entangled electrons) and 
phonons in the lattice disturb these. Too much changes in the latice 
break the cooper pairs, resulting in a critical temperature. One funny 
thing is that QM seems to be capable of describing the effect here 
(dynamic environment through phonons in the lattice), while it fails in 
the EPR case. I suppose that it's the problem of the blind men and the 
elefant.

-- 
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/

Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-06-29 15:12 -0700
  Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 22:08 -0400
  Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-06-30 14:13 +0200
    Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2011-06-30 18:19 +0200
    Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture ChrisQ <meru@devnull.com> - 2011-06-30 21:23 +0100
      Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2011-06-30 19:42 +0000
        Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-01 10:46 +0200
          Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2011-07-01 15:17 +0000
            Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture ChrisQ <meru@devnull.com> - 2011-07-04 16:51 +0100
      Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-07-01 05:54 +0100
    Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-06-30 22:42 -0700
    Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture jsavard@excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid (John Savard) - 2011-07-01 20:16 +0000
      Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-02 10:33 +0200
        Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-07-02 09:26 +0100
        Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture jsavard@excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid (John Savard) - 2011-07-02 12:40 +0000
          Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-07-02 16:14 +0100
          Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-07-02 16:48 -0400
            Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2011-07-02 14:27 -0700
              Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2011-07-03 15:07 -0500
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-04 08:15 +0200
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2011-07-04 17:50 +0200
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-04 21:21 +0200
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-04 23:44 -0500
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-05 07:51 +0200
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-05 01:56 -0500
            Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2011-07-03 19:28 +0200
          Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-07-03 11:27 -0700
            Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-07-03 22:13 +0100
              Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-07-03 18:53 -0700
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-07-04 08:34 +0100
            Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-07-03 18:51 -0700
            Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-07-04 09:20 +0000
              Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 12:26 -0700
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-07-04 19:35 -0400
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2011-07-08 15:48 +0200
            Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-05 15:24 -0700
              Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-07-08 09:25 -0700
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-07-08 12:12 -0700
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-07-08 17:27 -0700
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-07-09 18:07 -0400
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-07-10 12:03 -0400
                Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 13:02 -0700
    Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2011-07-08 15:13 +0200
  Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Gubbi <gubsan100@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-01 00:50 -0700

csiph-web