Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jsavard@excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid (John Savard) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch |
| Subject | Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture |
| Date | 2011-07-02 12:40 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <4e0f0fb6.148514@news.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4E0BA344.6000003@SPAM.comp-arch.net> <6s5ud8-ikv2.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> <4e0e2a2f.820481@news.aioe.org> <ko13e8-bm4.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> |
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 10:33:53 +0200, Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> wrote, in part: >John, please re-read what I wrote: > >Having a single clock source is of course doable, what I claimed was >that with a totally distributed setup, i.e. _no_ central distribution >point, you can't do the same. It is indeed true that I didn't fully address your real point, and that I even may have misunderstood part of what you wrote. >OTOH, even with a central clock there's no way to guarantee that you can >determine the absolute order of distributed events, you must also have a >central time stamp authority, and that would be an impossible bottleneck. Multiple synchronized time stamp authorities, of course, could establish order down to some minimal granularity below which events are seen as simultaneous. >You always end up with the need for some other way (i.e. something like >a cpu id) to arbitrate between "close enough" events, things that happen >within the clock resolution steps. But you've noted this. One thing, though; with a single clock, "close enough" really is simultaneous. >Add in relativity and you realize that it might not be even >theoretically possible to determine which of two events happened "first". Silly me. I was thinking in terms of parallel computers that are wired together and sitting on a floor somewhere, if not bolted to it. So a default reference frame would be obvious. Due to extreme propagation delays, a network of computers spanning the Solar System would not normally serve for tightly-coupled calculations. But someday such things might have applications at least as communications networks... and why shouldn't someone on Mars join in one of those "@home" projects, since embarassingly parallel problems don't have propagation to worry about much? So it could indeed be that relativistic considerations would someday impact the definition of priority... John Savard http://www.quadibloc.com/index.html
Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-06-29 15:12 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 22:08 -0400
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-06-30 14:13 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2011-06-30 18:19 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture ChrisQ <meru@devnull.com> - 2011-06-30 21:23 +0100
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2011-06-30 19:42 +0000
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-01 10:46 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2011-07-01 15:17 +0000
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture ChrisQ <meru@devnull.com> - 2011-07-04 16:51 +0100
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-07-01 05:54 +0100
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-06-30 22:42 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture jsavard@excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid (John Savard) - 2011-07-01 20:16 +0000
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-02 10:33 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-07-02 09:26 +0100
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture jsavard@excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid (John Savard) - 2011-07-02 12:40 +0000
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-07-02 16:14 +0100
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-07-02 16:48 -0400
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2011-07-02 14:27 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2011-07-03 15:07 -0500
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-04 08:15 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2011-07-04 17:50 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-04 21:21 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-04 23:44 -0500
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-05 07:51 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-05 01:56 -0500
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2011-07-03 19:28 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-07-03 11:27 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-07-03 22:13 +0100
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-07-03 18:53 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-07-04 08:34 +0100
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-07-03 18:51 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-07-04 09:20 +0000
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 12:26 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-07-04 19:35 -0400
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2011-07-08 15:48 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-05 15:24 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-07-08 09:25 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-07-08 12:12 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-07-08 17:27 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-07-09 18:07 -0400
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-07-10 12:03 -0400
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 13:02 -0700
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2011-07-08 15:13 +0200
Re: Notions of Time in Computer Architecture Gubbi <gubsan100@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-01 00:50 -0700
csiph-web