Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #684326
| From | Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Carbon Dioxide Is Not Our Enemy -- the Greening of Earth |
| Date | 2018-05-08 15:42 +0200 |
| Organization | news.eternal-september.org |
| Message-ID | <pcs9h3$cc6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <pcqr7q$jvg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pcreli$49e$1@dont-email.me> <up33fdh5dgsafsi03a698cudsvotntajor@4ax.com> |
Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> Wrote in message: > On Tue, 8 May 2018 08:04:31 +0200 (GMT+02:00), Libor Striz wrote: > >>The biggest enemies are usually our former friends who have turned >> wild. >> >>It is valid from society through physiology till environment. >> >>It occurs in many scenarios, that factors, otherwise beneficial or >> even essential, become harmful or even fatal at different >> conditions. >> >>Increasing CO2 content makes climate change worse, > > Your statement implicitly assumes that climate change is bad. My statement implicitly assumes that A change is bad, if you do not know it's consequences. ---------------------------- > Is **all** climate change bad? Yes, every climate change is bad, but no climate change is bad in all its aspects. ---------------------------- > > Has a climate never changed for the *better* ... anywhere in the > world? Would killing one person ever change for better life anywhere in the world ? Sometimes it would. But it does not make killing a person a good thing. ---------------------------- > Who says the climate changes that caused glaciers to retreat from > lower latitudes in the northern hemisphere were bad? All the species that disappeared, totally or locally. It is said Homo neanderthalensis extincted because he lost his evolutionary advantage against Homo sapiens, as he was better adapted to ice age. ---------------------------- > If some climates change for the better and some change for the worse, > is it a zero-sum game? In era of human society, the rich ones abuse the change to get more rich and poor will get more poor. Would you call zero sum game ? ---------------------------- That is: is the net effect on the planet a > "wash" ... and healthy for the planet (comparable to crop rotation)? It is a Russian roulette. If the chamber is empty , it is fun and exciting. If not, it is just killing. Such change has many consequences and we are aware just about some and only some we can predict. If the "wash" would affect majority of population, would you consider it good and healthy ? And if it would affect only your and neighbour countries, but other would benefit from it to sell you supplies, would you still consider it good and healthy ? ---------------------------- > > Is climate change "bad" only if it inconveniences humans? It is bad for its destroying potential. ---------------------------- > > Some PETA members will stress that humans are only a small fraction of > the creatures living on Earth. Sure, but we have responsibility for all of them, especially if our own acting affects the environment. And it does. CO2 raising, killing worming abd acidification of ocean s,, deforestation and asphaltification are just few examples. ---------------------------- > > Would Gaia want greenies to be **so** concerned about their own > personal, short-term convenience? > Rather, rich west people bother ONLY if their personal, short-term convenience is affected. What is just annoyance for some, is question of life and death for others. Starving to death as raining looks accross the ocean as personal, short-term convenience. -- Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer) "Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity." Miloš Forman ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Carbon Dioxide Is Not Our Enemy -- the Greening of Earth Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 19:33 -0500
Re:Carbon Dioxide Is Not Our Enemy -- the Greening of Earth Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:04 +0200
Re: Carbon Dioxide Is Not Our Enemy -- the Greening of Earth Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-08 08:06 -0400
Re: Carbon Dioxide Is Not Our Enemy -- the Greening of Earth Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-08 15:42 +0200
Re: Carbon Dioxide Is Not Our Enemy -- the Greening of Earth Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 01:00 -0400
Re: Carbon Dioxide Is Not Our Enemy -- the Greening of Earth Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-09 07:53 +0200
Re: Carbon Dioxide Is Not Our Enemy -- the Greening of Earth Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 07:55 -0400
Re: Carbon Dioxide Is Not Our Enemy -- the Greening of Earth benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:46 -0400
Re: Carbon Dioxide Is Not Our Enemy -- the Greening of Earth Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-05-09 05:26 -0400
csiph-web