Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.military.naval > #260278

Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft

From "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups sci.military.naval, sci.physics
Subject Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft
Date 2018-05-01 19:43 -0700
Organization n/a
Message-ID <pcb8k1$s3l$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <0ai2ed5vv7p7poiu5sd8l7fpbct434oiep@4ax.com> <pbuc8g$b2n$1@dont-email.me> <tpr5edhemh5qpkk628froinmqhrqv5l5i4@4ax.com> <pcak26$chp$1@dont-email.me> <rq2ieddkpr6sbm62v684vn12h165r7rp0h@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 5/1/2018 5:57 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
> "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote
> on Tue, 1 May 2018 13:52:19 -0700:
> 
>> On 4/27/2018 2:58 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote
>>> on Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:25:37 -0700:
>>>
>>>> On 4/25/2018 9:29 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote
>>>>> on Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:29:45 -0700:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/25/2018 11:05 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote on Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:21:50 -0500:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/24/2018 4:42 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/2018 1:50 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>       On 4/23/2018 11:17 PM, Juergen Nieveler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 24.04.2018 07:17, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Will taking off in an F16 soon be equal to taking off in an F22 wrt
>>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that they can both be seen!?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I doubt it will happen "soon"... but it's a stern reminder that
>>>>>>>>>>> stealth technology is just a bet against the ingeniousness of physics
>>>>>>>>>>> grad students in the next 5 decades...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That has to be interesting to any pilot. They might find themselves up
>>>>>>>>>> against a shi% load of active SAM sites. Ahh, well, the SAMS that are
>>>>>>>>>> left after the initial barrages of HARM's and JSOW's are fired off by
>>>>>>>>>> coalition aircraft.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-88_HARM
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-154_Joint_Standoff_Weapon
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The HARMS should target the SAMS, and the JSOW's should make the SAMS
>>>>>>>>>> fire off at projected phantom targets.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Love it:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-154_Joint_Standoff_Weapon#/media/File:AGM-154_03.jpg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ;^)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll just note that HARMs can't target SAMs.  They can only target the
>>>>>>> radars.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Argh! Sorry about that. You are correct. Well, if a SAM's radars are
>>>>>> severely damaged and/or outright destroyed, well, it is kind of rendered
>>>>>> into a highly degraded and somewhat worthless state, in a sense?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, but if you leave the missiles intact they can just drive in
>>>>> another radar.
>>>>
>>>> DOH! Correct again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Hence the use of JSOW on the missile emplacements.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed. Can JSOW launch a couple of MALD's?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No.  MALD are generally carried by something like B-52.  MALD flies
>>> long enough and far enough that it can be launched from well outside a
>>> MEZ.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Iirc, JSOW can project phantom radar signatures of coalition aircraft
>>>>>> and cause the SAM to fire at them. Then, finally, the JSOW can choose
>>>>>> where to perform its "final mission", to destroy a target.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.  I think you're thinking of MALD, which looks rather like JSOW
>>>>> but is much smaller and has a motor.
>>>>
>>>> You are absolutely correct on this one. For some reason I thought that
>>>> JSOW can project as well. Well, think of multiple MALD being released
>>> >from a cruise-type Phoenix like missile launched from a stand off aircraft.
>>>>
>>>> A single Phoenix can potentially launch multiple MALD after they "get
>>>> into a certain range". Heck, perhaps even a JSOW can launch some MALD's
>>>> in and of itself. Fractal layers of defense, in a sense?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No.  MALD is too big to be used as a submunition.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> JSOW saturation can deplete a SAM of missiles and might force it to be
>>>>>>>>>> reloaded. HARM saturation should destroy its radar systems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahh. I knew I wrote about HARM's destroying radars. Sorry for any
>>>>>> confusion, and thanks for your correction on my previous statement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The idea behind HARM is that it's so fast you don't need to do
>>>>> saturation attacks, hence the 'H' in the name.
>>>>
>>>> Well, imvvho, the more the merrier, high-speed or not. Imvvho, we should
>>>> mass produce these types of countermeasures, and never stop improving
>>>> their capabilities.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There are actually two (well, three) versions of MALD.  There's the
>>> baseline MALD, there's MALD-J, which includes patterned jamming, and
>>> there's a version with a little tiny warhead.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> However, perhaps "in the future", the damn enemy has an experimental
>>>>>>>>>> weapon that is "theoretically" immune to HARM and JSOW, and can easily
>>>>>>>>>> see and target F-22's. It can also tell the difference between F-16,
>>>>>>>>>> F-15, F-22 and F-35 in real time and act accordingly... Oh SHI%! The
>>>>>>>>>> coalition must be trying to prevent the enemy from engaging within
>>>>>>>>>> this line of experimentation.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> At least the F-22 is also a superb plane on top of being stealthy, so
>>>>>>>>>>> it could still fight on even terms with other fighters with the
>>>>>>>>>>> stealth advantage removed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Agreed. At least it has that handy Vulcan Cannon for a knife fight.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> yep => short range, inaccurate
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> USAF F-35 also carries a built-in cannon.  It just doesn't carry very
>>>>>>> many rounds for it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Imvvho, the pilots of an F-22 should not totally rely on hyper
>>>>>>>>>> advanced missile attack scenarios. I know they can fire on targets
>>>>>>>>>> from a long range via Phoenix, or medium range using AMRAAM. However,
>>>>>>>>>> even the newest versions of those missiles can fail to hit their
>>>>>>>>>> targets...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> aircraft have very good countermeasures, IR, microwave, decoys, flares
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Phoenix is dead.  The last airplane that could fire it was the F-14
>>>>>>> Tomcat.  USAF never owned any even when it was around, so it certainly
>>>>>>> was never a provision for F-22.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does the F-22 carry long range missiles, or just medium range?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AIM-120 is as good as it gets for pretty much everybody these days.
>>>>
>>>> Nice, kind of agreed. I would still like to be able to fire off multiple
>>>> very long range cruise missiles, kind of like Phoenix used as a
>>>> supplement of any all out assault. Perhaps Phoenix can be used to deploy
>>>> an little "army" of micro drones? F-14 was kind of assigned to a stand
>>>> off fleet defense role anyway, right?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not a workable alternative.  Phoenix got its range by doing a zoom
>>> climb up into the stratosphere and then diving down on the target.
>>> This worked well with bombers, but was less effective with a smaller,
>>> more maneuverable target like a fighter.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, what about applying that to the radar system of an enemy SAM? Can
>>>> it use a "swarm of drones" as an aspect of its overall radar system? So,
>>>> HARM might be not be quite as useful as it once was?
>>>>
>>>
>>> HARM is probably still ahead of ways to try to fool it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Phoenix required an AWG-9 radar.  The only aircraft to ever have that
>>>>> were the USN version of the F-111 (F-111B) which was never produced
>>>>> and the F-14 Tomcat.  That's not as bad as it might seem, though,
>>>>> since the AIM-120D can reach out almost 100 miles and the cruise
>>>>> missile carrying bomber air defense role for the Navy is much less
>>>>> required than it used to be.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For some reason, I would still launch some F-14's and put them on
>>>> standoff defensive orbits loaded with state-of-the-art AIM-54 and AIM-120's
>>>>
>>>
>>> F-14 was killed as too expensive to fly.  They aren't even in the
>>> Boneyard anymore.  They were ground up to prevent parts from being
>>> diverted to Iran.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The F-35 is a different topic...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Afaict, F-22's most likely can eat up F-35's for breakfast, lunch and
>>>>>>>>>> possibly dinner? Can the F-35 carry the newest Sidewinders? Does it
>>>>>>>>>> require an external pylon? If so, there goes stealth. Damn.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sidewinders need external pylon as they have to lock onto target before
>>>>>>>> launch
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not on an F-22 they don't.  On an F-22 they launch from internal bays.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are right. Thanks again Fred. :^)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I was in the missile business until a few years ago and do still keep
>>>>> some track of what's going on, so I'm not horribly out of date yet.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for taking the time to set me on the right path. Corrections =
>>>> learning! Very nice conversing with you Fred. :^)
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're quite welcome.
>>>
>>
>> Found a fairly decent advertisement from Raytheon:
>>
>> https://youtu.be/0acJ3xyhaJo
>>
> 
> It's not bad, but there's something they don't point out.  Practically
> all the JSOW belong to the Navy.  MALD is mostly Air Force, although I
> think they were integrating it on F/A-18 for the Navy.  Newer HARM is
> all Air Force, with the Navy opting to switch to a different (more
> expensive) weapon named AARGM.  So seeing all three Raytheon weapons
> used the way the ad's notional scenario describes is a little
> unlikely.
> 
>>
>> I would love to see a cruise missile deploy a swarm of little MALD's,
>> then finally fly off to destroy its "main" target...
>>
> 
> And just where would this notional cruise missile keep all these
> little MALDs (which would have to be an entirely new weapon and not
> MALD at all) and just how much space could possibly be left for a
> warhead?
> 
> 

Need to think more, but perhaps each individual drone can be contained 
in a little cylinder and use some clever origami after it is ejected. 
The missile would carry multiple cylinders. Perhaps, after it releases a 
swarm, it can go on orbit mode and use its radar, instead of warhead, to 
help guide its swarm.

Fractal design would allow the missile to deploy a couple of weapons 
that can go to other targets and deploy their own swarms. A single 
missile can potentially create and try to help guide a swarm of swarms.

Perhaps a squadron of drones can descend upon a ground based target and 
explode in special formations that act as if a hard core cluster bomb 
went off?

Back to sci.military.naval | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft George <george.core@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-23 13:38 +0000
  Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Dhu on Gate <campbell@neotext.ca> - 2018-04-23 15:45 +0000
  Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-23 22:17 -0700
    Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Juergen Nieveler <juergen@nieveler.org> - 2018-04-24 08:17 +0200
      Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-24 13:50 -0700
        Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-24 14:42 -0700
          Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-25 10:21 -0500
            Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 11:05 -0700
              Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-25 14:06 -0500
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 13:34 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft jonathan <WriteInstead@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 19:02 -0400
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 22:55 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2018-04-27 18:56 +0100
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2018-04-27 18:37 +0100
              Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-25 15:29 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 21:29 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-26 00:42 -0500
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-26 22:25 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 02:58 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-01 13:52 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 17:26 -0500
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 17:57 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-01 19:43 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 07:33 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Juergen Nieveler <juergen@nieveler.org> - 2018-04-27 09:17 +0200
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 03:03 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Airyx <eweinkam@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 05:22 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Peter Stickney <p_stickney@verizon.net> - 2018-04-27 16:46 -0400
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Juergen Nieveler <juergen@nieveler.org> - 2018-04-27 14:27 +0200
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Airyx <eweinkam@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 06:47 -0700
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-27 11:27 -0500
                Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft Peter Stickney <p_stickney@verizon.net> - 2018-04-27 16:50 -0400
              Long Range US Missiles in the 21st. Century WAS Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "David E. Powell" <david_powell3006@msn.com> - 2018-04-25 21:20 -0700
        Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-24 14:52 -0700
      Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetemelo@ask.me> - 2018-04-29 10:16 +0200
  Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2018-04-24 11:56 +0200
  Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-23 21:50 -0700
    Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-03 23:05 -0700
      Re: Quantum radar will expose stealth aircraft abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2018-07-04 11:55 +0200

csiph-web