Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1210091
| From | David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Patch V3 2/9] kernel/profile.c: Replace cpu_to_mem() with cpu_to_node() |
| Date | 2015-08-20 02:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pZlAC-4OU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pYj7P-3i1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYj7Q-3i1-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYD6x-6P7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZ5Pc-7hG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote: > On 2015/8/18 8:31, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote: > > > >> Function profile_cpu_callback() allocates memory without specifying > >> __GFP_THISNODE flag, so replace cpu_to_mem() with cpu_to_node() > >> because cpu_to_mem() may cause suboptimal memory allocation if > >> there's no free memory on the node returned by cpu_to_mem(). > >> > > > > Why is cpu_to_node() better with regard to free memory and NUMA locality? > Hi David, > Thanks for review. This is a special case pointed out by Tejun. > For the imagined topology, A<->B<->X<->C<->D, where A, B, C, D has > memory and X is memoryless. > Possible fallback lists are: > B: [ B, A, C, D] > X: [ B, C, A, D] > C: [ C, D, B, A] > > cpu_to_mem(X) will either return B or C. Let's assume it returns B. > Then we will use "B: [ B, A, C, D]" to allocate memory for X, which > is not the optimal fallback list for X. And cpu_to_node(X) returns > X, and "X: [ B, C, A, D]" is the optimal fallback list for X. Ok, that makes sense, but I would prefer that this alloc_pages_exact_node() change to alloc_pages_node() since, as you mention in your commit message, __GFP_THISNODE is not set. In the longterm, if we setup both zonelists correctly (no __GFP_THISNODE and with __GFP_THISNODE), then I'm not sure there's any reason to ever use cpu_to_mem() for alloc_pages(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[Patch V3 0/9] Enable memoryless node support for x86 Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 05:20 +0200
[Patch V3 6/9] i40evf: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 05:20 +0200
RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 6/9] i40evf: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node "Patil, Kiran" <kiran.patil@intel.com> - 2015-08-17 21:10 +0200
Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 6/9] i40evf: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> - 2015-08-18 23:40 +0200
[Patch V3 9/9] mm, x86: Enable memoryless node support to better support CPU/memory hotplug Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 05:20 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 9/9] mm, x86: Enable memoryless node support to better support CPU/memory hotplug Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2015-08-18 08:20 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 9/9] mm, x86: Enable memoryless node support to better support CPU/memory hotplug Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2015-08-18 13:40 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 9/9] mm, x86: Enable memoryless node support to better support CPU/memory hotplug Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-08-18 09:40 +0200
[Patch V3 1/9] x86, NUMA, ACPI: Online node earlier when doing CPU hot-addition Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 05:20 +0200
[Patch V3 2/9] kernel/profile.c: Replace cpu_to_mem() with cpu_to_node() Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 05:20 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 2/9] kernel/profile.c: Replace cpu_to_mem() with cpu_to_node() David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-08-18 02:40 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 2/9] kernel/profile.c: Replace cpu_to_mem() with cpu_to_node() Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-19 09:20 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 2/9] kernel/profile.c: Replace cpu_to_mem() with cpu_to_node() David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-08-20 02:10 +0200
[Patch V3 4/9] openvswitch: Replace cpu_to_node() with cpu_to_mem() to support memoryless node Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 05:20 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 4/9] openvswitch: Replace cpu_to_node() with cpu_to_mem() to support memoryless node Pravin Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com> - 2015-08-18 02:20 +0200
[Patch V3 7/9] x86, numa: Kill useless code to improve code readability Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 05:20 +0200
[Patch V3 3/9] sgi-xp: Replace cpu_to_node() with cpu_to_mem() to support memoryless node Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 05:20 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 3/9] sgi-xp: Replace cpu_to_node() with cpu_to_mem() to support memoryless node David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-08-18 02:30 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 3/9] sgi-xp: Replace cpu_to_node() with cpu_to_mem() to support memoryless node Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-19 10:30 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 3/9] sgi-xp: Replace cpu_to_node() with cpu_to_mem() to support memoryless node David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-08-20 02:10 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 3/9] sgi-xp: Replace cpu_to_node() with cpu_to_mem() to support memoryless node Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-20 08:40 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 3/9] sgi-xp: Replace cpu_to_node() with cpu_to_mem() to support memoryless node Robin Holt <robinmholt@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 14:00 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 3/9] sgi-xp: Replace cpu_to_node() with cpu_to_mem() to support memoryless node Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-19 14:50 +0200
[Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 05:20 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-08-18 02:40 +0200
RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node "Patil, Kiran" <kiran.patil@intel.com> - 2015-08-20 00:40 +0200
RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-08-20 02:20 +0200
[Patch V3 8/9] mm: Update _mem_id_[] for every possible CPU when memory configuration changes Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-17 05:20 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 0/9] Enable memoryless node support for x86 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-17 23:40 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 0/9] Enable memoryless node support for x86 Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2015-08-18 12:10 +0200
Re: [Patch V3 0/9] Enable memoryless node support for x86 Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-19 10:10 +0200
csiph-web