Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.sys.pdp10 > #9985

Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f

From scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
Subject Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f
Newsgroups alt.sys.pdp10
References (10 earlier) <7wwlt6rhw6.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> <874iga5jgr.fsf@debian> <87zey244ak.fsf@debian> <87mru2kp0z.fsf@nightsong.com> <mddh5kahrcv.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
Message-ID <pXBlS.7612$HWaf.4309@fx45.iad> (permalink)
Organization UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Date 2026-09-01 15:12 +0000

Show all headers | View raw


Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> writes:
>Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>
>> Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> writes:
>
>>> I see that XGP is the Xerox experimental XeroGraphic Printer--which strongly
>>> implies that the fonts are bilevel, not grayscale,
>
>> I remember XGP output as being pretty low quality back in its day.  I don't
>> remember if dot matrix impact printers were a thing then.  The early 300 dpi
>> desktop laser printers that came afterwards had much better output than the
>> XGP, though the XGP was apparently quite fast.  I never saw the XGP in
>> operation but I read a fair amount of stuff that it had printed.
>
>The XGP was 200dpi; the third generation Dover printer (used, e.g., at SAIL)
>was 384dpi, but the SAIL fonts were 200dpi.
>
>My own first experience with laser printers was the Xerox 9700, based on a much
>higher quality Xerox copier engine than the XGP/Dover.  It was 300dpi, had dual
>print engines so that duplex was a fast as simplex, and altogether a beast.  We
>attached it to an Amdahl 470/V7 running SVS (= OS/VS2 v1), then moved it to the
>3031 running MVS when that came in.

We had one as well, attached to a Itel AS/6 running MVS circa 1980.

Later, at Burroughs, we qualified them on the large and medium systems
mainframes.

Back to alt.sys.pdp10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

boxing all integers (was Re: Resources to learn common lisp?) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-29 17:52 -0300
  Re: boxing all integers (was Re: Resources to learn common lisp?) Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-08-30 06:43 +0000
    Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-30 13:11 -0300
      Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-08-31 05:14 +0000
        Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-31 06:54 +0000
        Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-31 13:43 -0300
          Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-31 13:56 -0300
            Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-08-31 13:34 -0700
              Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2026-08-31 18:12 -0400
                Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-09-01 15:12 +0000
            Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-09-01 05:59 +0000
              Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-02 15:23 -0300
          Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-09-01 05:45 +0000
            Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-09-01 07:07 +0000
            Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2026-09-01 17:36 -0400
              the history of the Hershey fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-02 15:55 -0300
                Re: the history of the Hershey fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:31 +0000
                Re: the history of the Hershey fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-03 09:59 -0300
            Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-02 16:35 -0300
              Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:50 +0000
                PDF file compactness (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-03 12:06 -0300
              Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-09-03 05:42 +0000
                Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-03 12:50 -0300
            origin of XGP fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-28 10:44 -0300
              Re: origin of XGP fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-09-28 07:33 -0700
                Re: origin of XGP fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-28 22:53 +0800
      Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-09-06 08:40 +0000

csiph-web