Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.sys.pdp10 > #9978
| From | Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.sys.pdp10 |
| Subject | Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f |
| Date | 2026-08-31 13:43 -0300 |
| Organization | Primarily biological and memetic |
| Message-ID | <874iga5jgr.fsf@debian> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <86se5zr6ez.fsf@williamsburg.bawden.org> <87mru47iou.fsf_-_@debian> <7wecfgrtuh.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> <874igb7fmv.fsf_-_@debian> <7wwlt6rhw6.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> |
Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> writes: > FASTAR is short for "fast arithmetic" and is the original manuscript > file name, not the name of the typesetting software. The software is > Greenblatt's TJ6, first written on the PDP-6 for preparing a paper on > his chess program MacHack VI. I see! Thank you. I should have realized that. > No, the fonts are pixelated at around 200 DPI. I wonder where they came from? If there are other fonts out there with compatible metrics, maybe they could be dropped in. For the typewriter font the body of the paper is set in, that should be pretty easy (its “m” and “i” are evidently the same width, and similarly “M” and “-”, so it’s almost certainly fixed-pitch, even though the word spaces and letter spaces vary for justification). However, the serif roman font used for the title and the letterhead, if that’s the term, evidently has variable pitch. If we’re lucky, it’s just the Hershey version of Times New Roman, a question which seems likely to be obvious to people who know fonts better than I do. > I can send you the raster data, and then you could do the rerendering. > > Here are some of the fonts converted to BDF raster fonts. Is the BDF conversion lossy? Glancing at the Python, it doesn’t appear to be thresholding grayscale or anything like that. Reverse-engineering outline data from raster data with something like potrace (or, since it’s 02026, running gradient descent on a differentiable polygon filling program) might be an interesting challenge, but I don’t think I’m up to it this week. > I also did a conversion the other way, rendering Comic Sans as an XGP > font. Here's a sample text. > > https://mastodon.sdf.org/deck/@larsbrinkhoff/116891010619446769 Hilarious! Kragen
Back to alt.sys.pdp10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
boxing all integers (was Re: Resources to learn common lisp?) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-29 17:52 -0300
Re: boxing all integers (was Re: Resources to learn common lisp?) Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-08-30 06:43 +0000
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-30 13:11 -0300
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-08-31 05:14 +0000
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-31 06:54 +0000
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-31 13:43 -0300
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-31 13:56 -0300
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-08-31 13:34 -0700
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2026-08-31 18:12 -0400
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-09-01 15:12 +0000
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-09-01 05:59 +0000
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-02 15:23 -0300
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-09-01 05:45 +0000
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-09-01 07:07 +0000
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2026-09-01 17:36 -0400
the history of the Hershey fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-02 15:55 -0300
Re: the history of the Hershey fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:31 +0000
Re: the history of the Hershey fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-03 09:59 -0300
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-02 16:35 -0300
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:50 +0000
PDF file compactness (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-03 12:06 -0300
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-09-03 05:42 +0000
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-03 12:50 -0300
origin of XGP fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-28 10:44 -0300
Re: origin of XGP fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-09-28 07:33 -0700
Re: origin of XGP fonts (was Re: reprints of old AI memos) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-28 22:53 +0800
Re: reprints of old AI memos (was Re: boxing all integers)f Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-09-06 08:40 +0000
csiph-web