Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1190919
| From | Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq |
| Date | 2015-07-23 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pPoJt-7XM-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <py0tQ-2l9-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <py0tR-2l9-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPmoh-4sh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPozL-7MD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Octavian Purdila > <octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila >> <octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote: >>> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have >>> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so >>> change all driver's checks accordingly. >>> >>> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree >>> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch >>> above. >>> >>> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that >> Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed? > > Me or Torvalds? > > This looks more like a Wolfram patch to me if it should not > go through IIO. > Hi Linus, This patch fixes one issue introduced by "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have interrupt assigned" which I see it is merged in the GPIO for-next branch. That is why I thought you will pick it up, did I assume wrong? Thanks, Tavi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-07-23 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> - 2015-07-23 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-07-23 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-07-23 15:30 +0200
csiph-web