Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1190920

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq

From Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq
Date 2015-07-23 15:30 +0200
Message-ID <pPoJt-7XM-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <py0tQ-2l9-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <py0tR-2l9-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPmoh-4sh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPozL-7MD-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 23/07/2015 at 15:11:47 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote :
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Octavian Purdila
> <octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila
> > <octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote:
> >> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have
> >> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so
> >> change all driver's checks accordingly.
> >>
> >> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree
> >> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch
> >> above.
> >>
> >> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that
> > Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed?
> 
> Me or Torvalds?
> 
> This looks more like a Wolfram patch to me if it should not
> go through IIO.
> 

The first cover letter had:

"Linus, since the commit above was already merged in the GPIO tree,
should these fixes be merged also via the GPIO tree (with ACKs from
the others subsystem maintainers)?"

I believe it was referring to you ;). I can take the rtc patch if you
don't plan to take it.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-07-23 15:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> - 2015-07-23 15:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-07-23 15:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ  in client->irq Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-07-23 15:30 +0200

csiph-web