Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1190920
| From | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq |
| Date | 2015-07-23 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pPoJt-7XM-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <py0tQ-2l9-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <py0tR-2l9-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPmoh-4sh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPozL-7MD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 23/07/2015 at 15:11:47 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote : > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Octavian Purdila > <octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila > > <octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote: > >> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have > >> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so > >> change all driver's checks accordingly. > >> > >> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree > >> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch > >> above. > >> > >> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> > >> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that > > Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed? > > Me or Torvalds? > > This looks more like a Wolfram patch to me if it should not > go through IIO. > The first cover letter had: "Linus, since the commit above was already merged in the GPIO tree, should these fixes be merged also via the GPIO tree (with ACKs from the others subsystem maintainers)?" I believe it was referring to you ;). I can take the rtc patch if you don't plan to take it. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-07-23 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> - 2015-07-23 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-07-23 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-07-23 15:30 +0200
csiph-web