Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1186071
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] locking/qrwlock: make use of acquire/release/relaxed atomics |
| Date | 2015-07-16 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pMUFR-48d-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pMTqr-2pX-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <pMTqs-2pX-67@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:32:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> @@ -130,8 +130,7 @@ static inline void queued_read_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
> /*
> * Atomically decrement the reader count
> */
> - smp_mb__before_atomic();
> - atomic_sub(_QR_BIAS, &lock->cnts);
> + (void)atomic_sub_return_release(_QR_BIAS, &lock->cnts);
> }
>
> /**
This one will actually cause different code on x86; I think its still
fine though. LOCK XADD should not be (much) slower than LOCK SUB.
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
> index a71bb3541880..879c8fab7bea 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ rspin_until_writer_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock, u32 cnts)
> {
> while ((cnts & _QW_WMASK) == _QW_LOCKED) {
> cpu_relax_lowlatency();
> - cnts = smp_load_acquire((u32 *)&lock->cnts);
> + cnts = atomic_read_acquire(&lock->cnts);
> }
> }
It might make sense to add comments to the users of this function that
actually rely on the _acquire semantics, I had to double check that :-)
But otherwise that all looks good.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 5/7] locking/qrwlock: make use of acquire/release/relaxed atomics Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-07-16 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] locking/qrwlock: make use of acquire/release/relaxed atomics Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-16 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] locking/qrwlock: make use of acquire/release/relaxed atomics Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-07-16 20:20 +0200
csiph-web