Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1166317

Re: [PATCH] small update for strlen, strnlen, use less cpu instructions

From Luke Skywalker <lukes357@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] small update for strlen, strnlen, use less cpu instructions
Date 2015-06-16 21:00 +0200
Message-ID <pC4fv-2B3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pBUJc-5Dr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pBWrE-8bF-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> This is not a valid patch submission. Please see
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

I resent the patch an hour ago based on that document, thanks for
pointing this out.
I need to know if the patch is in good shape now, thanks

>
> Anyway, why do you think your patch makes strlen() better?
> Now strlen() increments a variable for each character it faces, hence
> it will consume more cycles.

you can look at the output of objdump -d to see why, also the assembly
snippet send by another person make this clear.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] small update for strlen, strnlen, use less cpu instructions Luke Skywalker <lukes357@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 21:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] small update for strlen, strnlen, use less cpu  instructions Darth Vader <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-06-16 21:10 +0200

csiph-web